CronoDAS comments on An empirical test of anthropic principle / great filter reasoning - Less Wrong

8 Post author: James_Miller 24 March 2010 06:44PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (39)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: CronoDAS 24 March 2010 09:07:17PM 2 points [-]

Optimally compressed data is essentially indistinguishable from random noise. Could we tell the difference between a universe that has already been converted into computronium and one that's empty? If you had an awful lot of matter and energy and wanted to make the most powerful computing device possible, would it end up looking a lot like a star? Nuclear fusion is a great energy source, and there's lots of thermodynamic information in the atoms and molecules that make up a hot plasma.

Comment author: SilasBarta 24 March 2010 09:11:02PM *  4 points [-]

Optimally compressed data is essentially indistinguishable from random noise. Could we tell the difference between a universe that has already been converted into computronium and one that's empty?

Optimally compressed data also has the highest possible entropy (each bit is maximally informative), so that's how a universe being used as computronium would look. So we're not in such a universe, since:

a) It has too many observable regularities (i.e. we can and do further compress it by identifying laws of physics)
b) black holes have the highest entropy per unit mass, and most of the universe isn't one.
c) ETA: entropy manages to keep increasing, so it can't be at a maximum

Comment author: Academian 24 March 2010 09:13:52PM *  1 point [-]

Optimally compressed data is essentially indistinguishable from random noise.

YES! C.E. Shannon for the WIN :)

Comment author: SilasBarta 24 March 2010 09:25:49PM *  2 points [-]

It's a great insight, but not that hard to prove (or at least "get" the reasoning behind it): anything that distinguishes the data from randomness is redundant information, and that redundancy can be used to further compress it.

(Obviously, that doesn't count as a formal proof, &c.)

Comment deleted 24 March 2010 09:11:12PM [-]
Comment author: mattnewport 24 March 2010 09:28:25PM 2 points [-]

I'm not too up to date on my cosmology but isn't it still theorized that dark matter accounts for more mass than visible matter? I would expect advanced civilizations to minimize energy wastage through electromagnetic emissions. I'm not sufficiently knowledgeable about physics to know whether computronium would possibly have the theorized characteristics of dark matter however.