lavalamp comments on The mathematical universe: the map that is the territory - Less Wrong

68 Post author: ata 26 March 2010 09:26AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (119)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: TheAncientGeek 09 January 2014 09:23:49PM *  -1 points [-]

EDITED

No, the claim of Tegmarkian immaterialism is not that there is another substance other than matter.

You were previously saying that a log or record of mental style acrivity was probably produced by a mind. This is an explanation of an argument that you said supports "something to.like the MUH ". I still don'see how it does,. I am also puzzled that you thave been arguing against immaterialism throughout.

Comment author: lavalamp 09 January 2014 11:22:55PM 0 points [-]

I think we are having very significant communication difficulties. I am very puzzled that you think that I think that I'm arguing against MUH. I think something like MUH is likely true. I do not know what "Tegmarkian materialism" is and I'm not defending or attacking it. I also cannot make sense of some of your sentences, there seems to be some sort of editing problem.

Comment author: TheAncientGeek 10 January 2014 09:52:53AM 0 points [-]

I think you have been arguing against immaterialism, and that Tegmarkian MUH is a form of immaterialism.

I have edited my previous comment.