Alicorn comments on Newcomb's problem happened to me - Less Wrong

37 Post author: Academian 26 March 2010 06:31PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (97)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Alicorn 30 March 2010 08:55:56PM 1 point [-]

Well, it also implies that she started out thin, which would be an obvious stereotype of the marriageable girl with the chance to be picky expressed in the OP. "Fatter" would have been better, if still mean.

Comment author: wedrifid 30 March 2010 09:07:24PM 0 points [-]

Good point, I hadn't even thought of that implication.

Comment author: kim0 30 March 2010 09:24:52PM -2 points [-]

You all are quite good at picking up the implications, which means my post worked.

Comment author: wedrifid 31 March 2010 02:55:35AM 3 points [-]

It did work, in a way. But I did expend some effort trying to tease out the positive parts from the presentation. With only a minute's worth of extra effort you could have made it work better and I would be lining up here to give you status and respect for your contribution. I know you (may believe and or assert that you) aren't interested in status or respect here but if you care about the value are trying to 'work' here then you should be. You don't want your beliefs to be associated with 'the kind of things that only social outcasts would think'. That's what will happen if you go around supporting things that you care about while also acting like a prat, due to similar dynamics to the ones you described.

Comment author: RobinZ 30 March 2010 09:30:17PM 1 point [-]

If you intended the original comment as a test, you should have pointed out that it was a test. To do otherwise is quite rude.

Comment author: ata 30 March 2010 09:53:22PM 0 points [-]

I bet this is closer to what actually happened.

Comment author: RobinZ 30 March 2010 09:58:38PM 1 point [-]

I'd take the other side of that bet at even odds* if it were actually possible to make a wager of this.

* Translation for Bayesians: I think that the probability that kim0 is simply an idiot is less than 0.5.