= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
CannibalSmith comments on Announcing the Less Wrong Sub-Reddit - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (34)
Let's have a poll. Vote this comment up if you're in favor of using the sub-Reddit for assorted discussions instead of using open threads.
Other voting option is here, Karma balance is here
Where's the "neither" option? I don't like open threads, but neither I do going off site. Why can't we have a sub-lesswrong?
"Where's the "neither" option? I don't like open threads, but neither I do going off site. Why can't we have a sub-lesswrong?"
Because this is hard to implement. If you want to implement it yourself, please do so.
If LessWrong is based on Reddit, and Reddit can spawn subreddits at will, why can't LessWrong do the same?
Reddit's codebase has been heavily modified for Less Wrong, and subreddits can't be introduced without breaking the site. Seriously. People have tried to do this. It's hard.