jimmy comments on Open Thread: April 2010, Part 2 - Less Wrong

3 Post author: Unnamed 08 April 2010 03:09AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (194)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Emile 08 April 2010 04:21:25PM 5 points [-]

Any tips on efficiently gathering information on controversial, non-technical subjects, such a "how to raise your kids" or "pros and cons of spanking your kids"? (those are relatively good examples because a lot of people have a strong opinion on them)

I usually look on Wikipedia first, but while it's good at giving a basic overview of a question, it's quite bad at presenting evidence in a properly organized way (I learnt first hand that improving a controversial article is hard).

Research papers are more rigorous and more likely to contain actual useful and surprising information, but finding the right ones is quite a bit of work, and papers non-technical fields don't have a huge

Then there are all kinds of opinion columns and blogs and books - but they tend to be of varying quality, and I don't know what's the best way to find those that honestly summarize the available evidence (as opposed to taking a somewhat extreme position to make the writing more interesting, or trying to present the ideas as new, etc.).

Any useful tips and heuristics?

Comment author: jimmy 08 April 2010 05:04:05PM 2 points [-]

I'm also interested in hearing other peoples tricks, but I'll share mine.

The first thing I'd do is to check LW to see if I got lucky (google "spanking kids site:lesswrong.com" for example)

I don't really have any good tricks for finding good sources, but you might want to try adding some related technical words in your search to filter your results towards smarter people.

Once I find a source, the main thing I look for is "does this person understand the opposing arguments?". If they say something that suggests that they don't understand the idea that different forms of dis-utility might be interchangeable, or if they ever take the "it's bad because it's wrong!" stance, then I'll move on.