wedrifid comments on Eluding Attention Hijacks - Less Wrong

20 Post author: ABranco 17 April 2010 03:23AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (23)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: wedrifid 17 April 2010 04:27:22PM 0 points [-]

There's a very simple trick (originally posted by danarm) for dealing with the most harmful consequence of attention hijacks, namely, the difficulty to return to where your mind was before the hijack occurred:

'Most harmful consequence' is highly situational here and evidently varies a lot from person to person. When I am returning to the task I have no particular need for a piece of paper to redirect me. The task is right there on the call stack, I'm just not doing it. Perhaps my hijackers are of a different kind.

Comment author: wnoise 18 April 2010 06:16:32AM 0 points [-]

I have a limited stack depth.

Comment author: wedrifid 18 April 2010 07:54:26AM 0 points [-]

My stack depth varies depending what I am doing. This is to be expected given that with expertise comes the ability to operate on long term memory more or less as working. My 'programming' stack on a project that I have been working on is more or less unlimited.