= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
Academian comments on VNM expected utility theory: uses, abuses, and interpretation - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (48)
Yes (see above). It seems well agreed upon; I think I'll ETA a note about this to the post proper.
ETA: "noise" in your expected utility calculations might constitute positive-likelihood occasions to treat two expectations as equal...