pengvado comments on VNM expected utility theory: uses, abuses, and interpretation - Less Wrong

21 Post author: Academian 17 April 2010 08:23PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (48)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: pengvado 22 April 2010 10:44:58AM 0 points [-]

Does this merely mean that this type of risk-aversion is considered irrational and therefore not covered in the VNM model?

Yes. If you are risk-averse (or loss-averse) in terms of marginal changes in your money, then you're not optimizing any consistent function of your total amount of money.