RichardKennaway comments on CogSci books - Less Wrong

5 Post author: xamdam 20 April 2010 02:11PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (40)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: taw 21 April 2010 12:21:18AM 0 points [-]

It probably won't make me terribly popular around here, but I'd say books have lost their informational function, and these days are used primarily for signaling sophistication.

On nearly any subject, you'll get vastly more useful knowledge from googling than from reading any book.

This argument doesn't apply to fiction or to entertainment-value non-fiction - only for sources of serious learning. Linear non-interactive format is simply horrible at getting knowledge anywhere, and brains are great at filtering this out.

Comment author: RichardKennaway 21 April 2010 09:07:03AM *  2 points [-]

I don't find this with mathematics at all. If I want to learn some new area, I'll begin by looking on the Internet, but the main question motivating that search will be, "what books do I need to read?" Most of the knowledge simply isn't (yet) online in the form it needs to be for real learning.

Google and Wikipedia are entrance doors. Just reading a few Wiki pages or the top Google hits is like never entering further than the foyer of a library.