The FAI shouldn't like sugary tastes, sex, violence, bad arguments, whatever. It should like us to experience sugary tastes, sex, violence, bad arguments, whatever.

"I don't see how. Are you going to kill the snakes, or not?"

Presumably you act out a weighted balance of the voting power of possible human preferences extrapolated over different possible environments which they might create for themselves.

" Do you mean that you can use technology to let people experience simulated violence without actually hurting anybody? Doesn't that seem like building an inconsistency into your utopia? Wouldn't having a large number of such inconsistencies make utopia unstable, or lacking in integrity?"

I don't understand the problem here. I don't mean that this is the correct solution, though it is the obvious solution, but rather that I don't see what the problem is. Ancients, who endorsed violence, generally didn't understand or believe in personal death anyway.