= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
Thomas comments on Proposed New Features for Less Wrong - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (169)
It would be good to see not only the points, but how many downs and ups votes has been used for it. Not only -5, but -12 and 7, for example. That for the each post and each user. Somebody/something voted 1000 times with about 500 ups and about 500 downs is more interesting than something with only 2 ups.
It would be also nice to see, how many upvotes and downvotes somebody launched already. And to whom.
The last one maybe in a special (periodic) post, where the divisions would be clearly visible.
Yes, this sort of thing has been suggested a lot, and I still agree with some form of it.
Yes, I agree. That would be interesting. I'd be more tempted to read a post that I saw had a lot of both up and down votes, than I would be one that had few votes