= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
Academian comments on Proposed New Features for Less Wrong - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (169)
Yes, an FAQ is key to maintaining standards and lowering scariness. See here.
(Though I certainly won't pose anything like "Am I worthy". The relevant quality is in the post, not the author.)