Morendil comments on Proposed New Features for Less Wrong - Less Wrong

7 Post author: alyssavance 27 April 2010 01:10AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (169)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Morendil 27 April 2010 03:53:23PM 10 points [-]

More commenters increase the rate of great comments per hour

Yep - to the point that it's becoming hard to keep up.

If we "fix" the issue that is holding people back from participating, we may risk creating a worse one, where overload causes people to stop participating.

One of the things I like about LW is how people have longer memories than elsewhere (it's one thing that keeps us from returning to covered ground); we are often linking not just to past top-level posts but also to past comments.

But that requires keeping up with a lot of discussion. Even those of us who are fast readers with good memories and a "blink" capability for identifying which comments are worth reading and responding to... are only human and have limits.

I'm not sure how scalable the model is that makes the LW-of-today valuable to me, and presumably makes it valuable to others also.

Comment author: Jack 27 April 2010 04:39:30PM 3 points [-]

The memory issue is a really good point. Perhaps as LW grows posters will have to specialize. For example, I might follow everything written about philosophy and just read the top comments/collective wisdom on physics, ev psych etc.

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 27 April 2010 04:12:29PM 2 points [-]

I was thinking about the scaling and attention problem, with no obvious answer except that LW might hive off related blogs.