Morendil comments on Proposed New Features for Less Wrong - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (169)
Yep - to the point that it's becoming hard to keep up.
If we "fix" the issue that is holding people back from participating, we may risk creating a worse one, where overload causes people to stop participating.
One of the things I like about LW is how people have longer memories than elsewhere (it's one thing that keeps us from returning to covered ground); we are often linking not just to past top-level posts but also to past comments.
But that requires keeping up with a lot of discussion. Even those of us who are fast readers with good memories and a "blink" capability for identifying which comments are worth reading and responding to... are only human and have limits.
I'm not sure how scalable the model is that makes the LW-of-today valuable to me, and presumably makes it valuable to others also.
The memory issue is a really good point. Perhaps as LW grows posters will have to specialize. For example, I might follow everything written about philosophy and just read the top comments/collective wisdom on physics, ev psych etc.
I was thinking about the scaling and attention problem, with no obvious answer except that LW might hive off related blogs.