How does this even begin to hit Jack's point? Jack hasn't claimed that there might not be such bias on LW nor has anyone else. For that matter, it wouldn't surprise me if there's a small bit of bias against 9/11 Truthers here. I think it is quite clear that there are a lot of biases operating here. And I can supply strong evidence for a major bias on demand. But that in no way says anything useful about what happened on 9/11 unless you think that the biases here are because Eliezer and Robin are somehow involved in covering up the big nasty conspiracy and have deliberately cultivated an anti- 9/11 Truther attitude to assist the conspiracy in its cover up.

I'll let Blueberry take this bet since he(?) wants it.

Does this mean you're not interested in a wager regarding 9/11 itself though?

Well, I'd accept anyone who was not a rabid Truther, because I don't believe that Truthers will ever be convinced regardless of the evidence. But maybe Roland thinks anyone who isn't a rabid Truther is too strongly biased.

If that's all that's holding you back, you could send them a private message. But I don't think you need to do even that; posting on a blog means accepting that people may publically rebut your arguments.

Everyone here is here ostensibly to have their false beliefs exposed. If they are deceiving people here that is even worse.

If you are right, then numerous people on this forum are likely to have been misinformed and would benefit from correction. If you are wrong, then you are unlikely to cause harm by naming the individual in question.

In addition, if you are thinking of me, I would like to be told so.

If I'm the selected adjudicator I'm willing to do it in private and keep the details secret.