= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
Thomas comments on But Somebody Would Have Noticed - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (250)
The original form of Russell's (Zermelo's in fact) paradox is not this. The original form is {x|x not member of x}.
That leads to both
and
And that is the original form of the paradox.
No. See for example This discussion. The form you give where it is described as a simple predicate recursion was not the original form of the paradox.