SilasBarta comments on But Somebody Would Have Noticed - Less Wrong

36 Post author: Alicorn 04 May 2010 06:56PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (250)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Jack 07 May 2010 04:33:04PM 1 point [-]

I wouldn't say I'm disturbed. But I am confused.

It is an overbroad criticism of the "Would someone have noticed?" heuristic which, as Tehom and timtyler point out, is actually very useful.

I took myself to be making the same kind of point here though in a bit of a round-a-bout and indirect way. All of these criticisms were heavily voted up, as well. I wonder if front page posts have a de facto karma floor in the high twenties just because they get more traffic than posts that aren't promoted. Aside from the occasional work of brilliance and the special threads almost every promoted post has a karma total between 25 and 33. I think the promotion system probably needs more scrutiny or at least we need a way of distinguishing "Promoted for discussion purposes" and "Promoted for truth".

Comment author: SilasBarta 07 May 2010 04:38:49PM *  0 points [-]

Couldn't have said it better myself.

Maybe we should do something like: require promotion to penalize the user 50 karma if the post doesn't get at least 20 net upvotes? (I'm guessing this one of mine would have gotten more than 5 additional net upvotes if it had been promoted...)