Airedale comments on The Social Coprocessor Model - Less Wrong

22 [deleted] 14 May 2010 05:10PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (570)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Airedale 15 May 2010 03:12:39PM 7 points [-]

What you're describing seems like the introversion/extroversion distinction, which is probably different from, although possibly overlapping and somewhat correlated with, the autism spectrum/NT distinction. The introversion/extroversion literature seems to capture the difference pretty well; just about everything I've read about introversion recognizes that introverts can be competent to excellent at one-on-one or small group socializing, but that they are probably less good and certainly uncomfortable in large group settings. But I don't recall reading much about introverts that suggests they're unable to read social cues (although they may have less practice at it as well as less interest).

I haven't seen a breakdown on introversion/extroversion numbers in the population (my own quick Google search found an article in the Atlantic with this passage: "How many people are introverts? I performed exhaustive research on this question, in the form of a quick Google search. The answer: About 25 percent. Or: Just under half. Or—my favorite—'a minority in the regular population but a majority in the gifted population.'"), and as NancyLebovitz also suggests, I believe it varies between cultures, but what numbers I have seen seem to suggest that the percentage of people who fall more on the introverted side of the scale is probably considerably greater than the percentage of people who fall on the autism spectrum.

It's certainly possible that neurotypical people misunderstand autism spectrum people, and that extroverts misunderstand introverts (the Atlantic article makes that argument), but the autism spectrum descriptions about not understanding social cues seem to be getting at something real and different than introversion. Your description makes you sound like an introvert but not particularly far along (if at all) on the autism spectrum. It does seem like some of our commentary here may sometimes be casually conflating extroversion with neurotypicalness and introversion with autism spectrum.

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 15 May 2010 03:35:11PM 3 points [-]

I didn't quite say that.

There's social pressure to be extroverted in the US-- but there are a lot of unhappy introverts. There's social pressure to be introverted in other places (Great Britain?), but for all I know there are a lot of squelched-feeling, lonely extroverts.

Comment author: JohannesDahlstrom 16 May 2010 09:22:48PM *  6 points [-]

Finns (disclaimer: I am one) are probably the archetypal introverts.

When a stranger on the street smiles at you, you assume that:

a. he is drunk

b. he is insane

c. he is American

d. he is all of the above

-- You know you've been too long in Finland when...

Comment author: whpearson 15 May 2010 06:07:46PM 4 points [-]

Alas no, there is no social pressure to be introverted here in the UK, at least not in my generation and younger. We have the same celebrity culture which idolises the loud and outgoing as does America.

Middle class, middle aged British people are a bit more reserved than the younger generation.

Comment author: Yvain 16 May 2010 03:19:31PM 3 points [-]

I live in Ireland, and the social pressure in favor of extraversion is at least as great as in the United States.

Comment author: Airedale 15 May 2010 04:11:32PM 0 points [-]

I apologize for misreading your comment. When you wrote:

culture affects how social people are expected to be.

and

extroversion is much more compulsory in the US than in a lot of other places.

I had thought you were suggesting that cultural pressure would influence people to become extroverts (or introverts as the case may be in some cultures). Actually, I would guess that the dominant social culture would cause both these things: 1) some people, probably influenced from an early age, would be more likely to become extroverts in an extrovert-dominated culture (or vice versa); and 2) some people would feel unhappy because they didn't fit into the dominant culture.

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 15 May 2010 04:24:29PM 1 point [-]

No biggis.

I agree it's plausible those who have some flexibility between introversion and extroversion will probably become what fits in their culture, but not everyone can do that.

It occurs to me that we're putting a lot of thought into how people can be more like extroverts, but I haven't heard anything about how people can become more comfortable with their own company. Meditation presumably helps, but is there anything more specific?

Comment author: Peterdjones 26 December 2012 02:22:55PM 0 points [-]

About 25 percent

I believe that is a US-specific figure

Comment author: [deleted] 26 December 2012 12:09:45PM *  0 points [-]

What you're describing seems like the introversion/extroversion distinction, which is probably different from, although possibly overlapping and somewhat correlated with, the autism spectrum/NT distinction.

Indeed, I have slightly higher AQ than him but nearly median extroversion, and my experience is the opposite of his.

How many people are introverts?

Isn't introversion/extroversion a continuum? If so, what would that question even mean? How many people are tall?