pjeby comments on The Social Coprocessor Model - Less Wrong

22 [deleted] 14 May 2010 05:10PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (570)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: pjeby 18 May 2010 01:00:20AM 8 points [-]

(I'm granting for the sake of the exercise that I'd ask for a drink in the first place, even though in real life I don't consume alcohol.)

Which is precisely why the offered hypothetical is worse than useless in this case.

Bear in mind that in the circumstance being discussed, asking for a drink is like asking someone to hand you $5 -- for no reason at all other than than that you asked, and the fact that they are a male.

To presume that you would react in a certain way, conditional upon first having done something so utterly foreign to you in the first place, is like saying what you'd do if the moon were made of green cheese, only ISTM you'd have a better chance of being right in that case. ;-)

Comment author: Alicorn 18 May 2010 01:02:48AM *  0 points [-]

Well, pretend the bar serves something I'd drink. Say I'd get a virgin pina colada. I could imagine asking for one of those.

the fact that they are a male.

I might also ask girls, if the environment gave me high enough priors on them being bi/gay.

Comment author: pjeby 18 May 2010 01:14:16AM 8 points [-]

Well, pretend the bar serves something I'd drink. Say I'd get a virgin pina colada. I could imagine asking for one of those. I might also ask girls, if the environment gave me high enough priors on them being bi/gay.

So, your moral compass allows you to use other people's sexual preferences as a money pump?

(And no, that's not a line, although now that I've said it, I suppose it could be reworked into a LW-friendly response to a drink request. Needs more humor, less judgment, though! Hm, maybe "Are you trying to exploit my hardware preferences as a money pump?" A little too double-entrendreish, though. These things are really situational, and not at all suited to cached responses.)

Comment author: Alicorn 18 May 2010 01:40:05AM 0 points [-]

I can't actually think of any situation where asking a question seems to me to be immoral. It can't be a denotative falsehood, so it's clear on the "lying" front; there's nothing else obvious it could be that would be wrong. I suppose it could be mean, or impolite, but this doesn't even appear to be that to me. I wouldn't badger anybody about buying me the beverage, which would be mean.

Comment author: mattnewport 18 May 2010 01:58:44AM *  6 points [-]

This is a request which is slightly different from a question. Some requests are considered immoral when there is a power or status differential. University lecturers and students provide an example where some requests are widely considered immoral.

Comment author: Alicorn 18 May 2010 02:03:39AM 1 point [-]

Point. Questions/requests that predictably create a sense of obligation in the hearer to do something they ought not feel obligated to perform may be wrong. I don't think I can, let alone do, project enough power in a casual setting to make anyone feel obliged to buy me the liquid of my choice, although I suppose it's possible I'm mistaken.

Comment author: HughRistik 18 May 2010 02:21:21AM 2 points [-]

I don't think I can, let alone do, project enough power in a casual setting to make anyone feel obliged to buy me the liquid of my choice, although I suppose it's possible I'm mistaken.

Refusing makes the guy look bad, unless he has a particularly adept response. The request becomes "buy me a drink, or go through status shenanigans to not look bad." That's not exactly obligation, but it is a form of social pressure.

Asking for $5 (well, probably $7-8 if it's not a beer) isn't exactly obligation, either. Is that a request you would make of both men and women? If not, why not? And how it is different to a request from a drink, other than the latter being wrapped up in more social frills (and combined with more social pressure)?

If anyone is saying "excuse me?" shouldn't it be the person being asked for the drink (aka $7)? The only problem is that if men make this response, they look bad, due to the context-specific social power differential.

Comment author: Alicorn 18 May 2010 02:24:41AM 0 points [-]

Is that a request you would make of both men and women?

Yes, I said so elsewhere.

Comment author: HughRistik 18 May 2010 02:29:29AM *  1 point [-]

Right, my question here was whether you would ask both men and women for $7 on its own. I should have made that clearer.

And if not, how it asking for a $7 drink different?

Comment author: Alicorn 18 May 2010 02:32:48AM 1 point [-]

I would not ask a stranger for money unless I had an urgent, immediate need for it and no other way to get it. Asking for a drink seems different in much the same way that asking my friends for books instead of money on my birthday seems different. The drink provides a context for some sort of interaction; the money doesn't.

Comment author: mattnewport 18 May 2010 02:14:24AM 2 points [-]

There is also an implied contract with most requests. Many people if asked to buy a stranger a drink will assume that agreeing to the request will result in an opportunity for conversation at least. If someone makes the request with an understanding of the implied trade and no intention of fulfilling their half of the bargain then that seems at least dishonest if not actually immoral.

Comment author: Alicorn 18 May 2010 02:18:09AM 0 points [-]

I wouldn't request a favor like this from someone I didn't plan to have at least a short conversation with. (I would ask smaller favors, like that they tell me the time, or more urgent favors, like that they loan me their cell phone so I can call my ride, but a drink is neither negligible nor particularly important.)

Comment author: mattnewport 18 May 2010 02:24:57AM 1 point [-]

Maybe you wouldn't. I'm just giving an example of another way that a question/request could be seen to be immoral.