RichardKennaway comments on The Social Coprocessor Model - Less Wrong

22 [deleted] 14 May 2010 05:10PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (570)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: RichardKennaway 18 May 2010 12:07:16PM 4 points [-]

It is falsifiable -- it claims that you won't get laid as much by failing shit tests as by passing them.

The explanation is fitted to the observations of the custom. It is therefore not supported by the observations. Had the observations been different, the explanation would never have been invented.