JoshSN comments on Q&A with Harpending and Cochran - Less Wrong

26 Post author: MBlume 10 May 2010 11:01PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (103)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: harpend 12 May 2010 04:46:30PM 7 points [-]

It is an interesting puzzle. This was a secular rise in cognitive test scores well documented in a number of countries during the 20th century. It has stopped and even reversed in the last few decades. There seem to be several pausible ideas out there

One is that social changes have had the effect of "training" people for cognitive tests: more magazines, radio, chatter everywhere, advertising, etc. Hard idea to test. I do fieldwork in Southern Africa. Forty years ago there were no radios in the backcountry, no books, no magazines. Today radio, newspapers, magazines are everywhere. I expect that this changes people a lot but I have no evidence.

Flynn himself thinks nutrition got better but the data are not clear about that. I would favor as an explanation vaccination and antibiotics. Infectious disease and the inflammation associated with it does seem to damage people (Caleb Finch, Eileen Crimmins, others). We have cut the intensity of childhood insults way down everywhere.

My two cents........

Comment author: JoshSN 15 May 2010 07:28:27PM -1 points [-]

Well, now it is four cents. Parents even teach to IQ tests.

Childhood insults? I'm sure you meant childhood disease.

Comment author: cupholder 15 May 2010 09:20:20PM 2 points [-]

I think Harpending was using the word 'insults' in the (less common nowadays) sense of 'injuries.'