simplicio comments on The Tragedy of the Social Epistemology Commons - Less Wrong

41 [deleted] 21 May 2010 12:42PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (67)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: simplicio 30 May 2010 03:06:25PM *  4 points [-]

I think I see your point... though the "What can be destroyed by the truth, should be" quote, I always took to be limited to the world of ideas; i.e., any idea that can be... should be.

But as has been remarked before, the more you load an aphorism down with caveats, the worse an aphorism it becomes. Or as Shakespeare famously said: "Brevity - in speech and conduct, but not in any other senses of the word - is the soul, understood metaphorically & non-dualistically of course, of wit."

So while I see your concern in principle, I'm not too worried. I really doubt that LWers actually take this quote to mean you have a moral duty to, for example, visit old widowers and widows and berate them for the stupidity of talking to their dead lovers. Or find out and reveal the USA's nuclear launch codes. Or forcibly "out" every young LGBT person they know.

Comment author: MichaelVassar 31 May 2010 03:50:46PM 3 points [-]

Actually, those do seem like the sort of things that LWers would be much more inclined to do than would the general population. The odds would still be low in such spectacularly obvious cases, but much less low than they should be.