KrisC comments on More art, less stink: Taking the PU out of PUA - Less Wrong

66 Post author: XFrequentist 10 September 2010 12:25AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (616)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: KrisC 10 September 2010 06:08:58AM *  3 points [-]

Intriguing.

I do believe that the discussion should take place off LW. The LW karma system creates biases and would be muddied by the pursuit of a different goal.

Comment author: luminosity 11 September 2010 10:55:40AM 0 points [-]

What particular biases are you worried about karma affecting? At first thought, I see more reasons why karma would be benficial than not. For instance, someone who proposes many ideas that don't work, and won't update on that evidence would be expected to get a low karma. New people to the community can see at a glance that following their advice is substantially less likely to be valuable than following the advice of someone else. Indeed, following particularly poor advice could easily be harmful, so having a warning would be very important.

Comment author: KrisC 11 September 2010 06:07:52PM 2 points [-]

My concern is that the LW standards of communication and goal of rationality do not correspond to PUA methods. Rewarding a user for advancing a PUA discussion does not reward rational discussion but instead rewards the ability to teach social interaction.

As teaching social interaction is not a subset of rational behavior, so PUA discussion is not a subset of LW discussion. The difference lies in the approach to subconscious stimuli; PUA exploits where LW illuminates.

Comment author: wedrifid 11 September 2010 06:43:03PM 2 points [-]

The difference lies in the approach to subconscious stimuli; PUA exploits where LW illuminates.

I reject your premise.

Comment author: KrisC 11 September 2010 07:18:33PM 2 points [-]

Please elaborate.