Jonathan_Graehl comments on More art, less stink: Taking the PU out of PUA - Less Wrong

66 Post author: XFrequentist 10 September 2010 12:25AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (616)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Jonathan_Graehl 10 September 2010 10:22:02PM *  1 point [-]

I assumed they had also shown some isolated improvement from a specific memory of failure alone, which was indeed surprising to me.

Some of the participants were asked to reflect on a number of their past successes or failures by completing the sentence: "In general, I'm successful (I fail) when...."

The other participants were focused instead on a single episode of success or failure, by completing the sentence: "I succeeded (failed) once when I had to...."

The results were remarkable. People who were asked to reflect on their many past successes or a specific failure scored roughly 10% better on tests of mathematical ability, as well as verbal, spatial, and abstract reasoning, than those who reflected on either many past failures or a single specific success.

So my report of the article was correct. So, if what you say is true, then the article misrepresented the study (which I also have not read).

Comment author: jacob_cannell 10 September 2010 11:18:51PM *  2 points [-]

Yeah I started reading the article and then after a few paragraphs realized "this isn't a physics paper, it would be quicker to just read the original". If I wasn't busy/lazy, I'd read the full paper and comment on the article to point out that it misrepresents its source paper, but it's not a wikipedia article, so I don't care so much. Happens all the time.

Comment author: Jonathan_Graehl 11 September 2010 01:45:25AM 1 point [-]

Cool. The average quality of thinking on the blog (psychologytoday) is really low, so I should probably treat it like you do.