rhollerith_dot_com comments on More art, less stink: Taking the PU out of PUA - Less Wrong

66 Post author: XFrequentist 10 September 2010 12:25AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (616)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: rhollerith_dot_com 11 September 2010 07:50:21PM *  1 point [-]

Say we raise his probability of success, to 0.01. If our gentleman is so revved up that he then goes out and talks to 1000 women (performs 1000 trials), there's a >99.99% chance he'll have at least one success.

The (fatal) flaw in your argument is that you multiplied probabilities without checking your model of reality for any obvious reasons to believe that the probabilities might be significantly dependent on each other.

In other words, if all we know about a man is that he is trying to mate, is the probability that he will succeed with woman #900 given that he struck out with #1 through #899 really the same as the probability that he will succeed with woman #1?

Comment author: Will_Sawin 11 September 2010 08:19:45PM 3 points [-]

The general point still holds. P(at least one success) can be very large even if P(nth attempt succeeds) is small, for all n.

Comment author: XFrequentist 11 September 2010 08:23:09PM *  1 point [-]

The independence assumption is implicit in my calling them Bernoulli trials, but you are correct that this may not be valid. Still, the general point stands. Good catch!