whpearson comments on Link: Strong Inference - Less Wrong

9 Post author: Daniel_Burfoot 23 May 2010 02:49AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (54)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Daniel_Burfoot 25 May 2010 01:54:17PM 1 point [-]

Sure, it's not that the idea of the Gaussian Copula itself is wrong. It's a mathematical theory, the only way it can be wrong is if there's a flaw in the proof. The problem is that people were overeager to apply the GC as a description of reality. Why? Well, my belief is that it has to do with overmathematization.

Really, it's odd that there is so much pushback against this idea. To me, it seems like a natural consequence of the Hansonian maxim that "research isn't about progress". People want to signal high status and affiliate with other high status folks. One way to do this is the use of gratuitous mathematics. It's just like those annoying people who use big words to show off.

Comment author: whpearson 25 May 2010 02:11:57PM 0 points [-]

I'm guessing that people tend to think the opposite of over mathematization is hand waving. Perhaps you could talk about inappropriate mathematization. An example would things like the majority of artificial neural networks. Interesting maths and systems to be sure, but a million miles away from actual neurons.