RobinZ comments on Virtue Ethics for Consequentialists - Less Wrong

33 Post author: Will_Newsome 04 June 2010 04:08PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (178)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: RobinZ 05 June 2010 04:31:54AM 2 points [-]

I have no idea what a Schelling point is, but the rest of it makes enough sense that I don't think I'm missing too much - thanks for the explanation!

Comment author: Vladimir_M 05 June 2010 05:00:42AM *  6 points [-]

I recommend this article by David Friedman on the topic -- if you've never heard of the concept, you'll probably find lots of interesting insight in it:
http://www.daviddfriedman.com/Academic/Property/Property.html

Friedman uses Schelling points in an attempt to explain the origin of the concept of property rights among humans and the associated legal and social norms, but the approach can be generalized in an obvious way to a much wider class of relations between people (basically anything that could hypothetically lead to a conflict, in the broadest possible sense of the term).

Comment author: Will_Newsome 23 January 2012 12:07:25AM 4 points [-]

I'm curious, has anyone accused you of being Steve Rayhawk yet?