RobinZ comments on Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality discussion thread - Less Wrong

34 Post author: Unnamed 27 May 2010 12:10AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (866)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: RobinZ 01 June 2010 06:47:14PM 3 points [-]

In Chapter 6, when Harry was buying the trunk: his whole speech about planning fallacies and collaborators ... wasn't really necessary, was it? Even had he not stolen his own money, I doubt that the proprietor would have refused a down payment accompanied by a request to hold the trunk overnight, pending the remainder of the sum to be payed in the morning.

That said: what if he had simply withdrawn the eleven Galleons and presented them as a fait accompli, without preface?

Comment author: LucasSloan 03 June 2010 12:49:24AM 7 points [-]

I don't believe the true reason for the speech was to get McGonagall to agree with his actions - It was to assert his dominance over her.

Comment author: RobinZ 03 June 2010 12:55:52AM 1 point [-]

Well, yes. I'm wondering what McGonagall's reactions would have been in the counterfactual where he wasn't working to establish authority over her.