Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality discussion thread

34 Post author: Unnamed 27 May 2010 12:10AM

Update: Please post new comments in the latest HPMOR discussion thread, now in the discussion section, since this thread and its first few successors have grown unwieldy (direct links: two, three, four, five, six, seven).

As many of you already know, Eliezer Yudkowsky is writing a Harry Potter fanfic, Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality, starring a rationalist Harry Potter with ambitions to transform the world by bringing the rationalist/scientific method to magic.  But of course a more powerful Potter requires a more challenging wizarding world, and ... well, you can see for yourself how that plays out.

This thread is for discussion of anything related to the story, including insights, confusions, questions, speculation, jokes, discussion of rationality issues raised in the story, attempts at fanfic spinoffs, comments about related fanfictions, and meta-discussion about the fact that Eliezer Yudkowsky is writing Harry Potter fan-fiction (presumably as a means of raising the sanity waterline).

I'm making this a top-level post to create a centralized location for that discussion, since I'm guessing people have things to say (I know I do) and there isn't a great place to put them.  fanfiction.net has a different set of users (plus no threading or karma), the main discussion here has been in an old open thread which has petered out and is already near the unwieldy size that would call for a top-level post, and we've had discussions come up in a few other places.  So let's have that discussion here. 

Comments here will obviously be full of spoilers, and I don't think it makes sense to rot13 the whole thread, so consider this a spoiler warning:  this thread contains unrot13'd spoilers for Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality up to the current chapter and for the original Harry Potter series.  Please continue to use rot13 for spoilers to other works of fiction, or if you have insider knowledge of future chapters of Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality.

A suggestion: mention at the top of your comment which chapter you're commenting on, or what chapter you're up to, so that people can understand the context of your comment even after more chapters have been posted.  This can also help people avoid reading spoilers for a new chapter before they realize that there is a new chapter.

Comments (866)

Sort By: Controversial
Comment author: cousin_it 03 July 2010 10:52:25AM 1 point [-]

Chapter 28: IMO, worst chapter yet. Harry is overpowered, and Hermione's reaction is overdone.

Comment author: lmnop 03 July 2010 08:48:11PM 1 point [-]

I don't think Harry is too powerful, but Hermione's reaction is definitely overdone. Eliezer's taken her weakness from the books and actually magnified it, when it's my understanding that the characters in this story are supposed to be better, more competent versions of their canon selves. Hermione has a lot of potential, so I hope he gives her some character development soon.

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 03 July 2010 11:46:19PM 2 points [-]

Interesting-- I think this chapter has the least unsatisfactory presentation of Hermione so far.

It's at least plausible that she'd be less self-assured than the canon version-- she's in a much weirder situation.

Comment author: wedrifid 04 July 2010 02:58:45AM *  1 point [-]

That was my experience too. She was much more likable as well!

I also liked some emphasis on Harry's cooperation with Hermione instead of more Harry-Draco stuff. Relying purely on trying to out-game a Malfoy for the purpose of developing godlike powers is a rather poor strategy.

Comment author: JGWeissman 03 July 2010 09:07:35PM 9 points [-]

Seriously? Did you miss the part about "I think that the second degree of caution will suffice."?

When Harry did the experiment under the supervision of an experienced, adult wizard, he had all sorts of safety precautions in place, that he did not have when he tried it on his own.

Hermione was right, Harry could have gotten them killed by trying novel tricks without any sort of precautions. And having seen the standard precautions, Harry understood this, which is why:

"Um, Hermione?" Harry said in a very small voice. "I think I owe you a really, really, really big apology."

Comment author: lmnop 04 July 2010 12:08:48AM *  3 points [-]

My problem wasn't that Hermione advocated more caution, but that she seemed to be doing so only because they were going "against the rules" (without really understanding why the rule existed). But I reread the scene with her confrontation of Harry just now and I think I didn't give her enough credit/ was confusing her with the canon version. Go Hermione ;)

Comment author: wedrifid 03 July 2010 04:01:36PM 1 point [-]

Harry is overpowered

Really? Because he can transfigure parts of objects? I took that as the rest of the wizarding world being incompetent.

Comment author: WrongBot 03 July 2010 07:44:16PM 4 points [-]

This ability is at least as dangerous as the killing curse, if not more so. People are objects. Harry can now transfigure, say, a chunk of someone else's brain into steel, or glass, or water. Turning someone else into a ferret is scary, yes, but they'll turn back little the worse for wear.

This makes Harry very, very dangerous, especially because he hasn't realized it yet.

Comment author: wedrifid 04 July 2010 02:25:47AM 10 points [-]

I always thought the killing curse was overrated. Many of the spells that first years use in pranks on each other will get you a kill if you are carrying a knife in your pocket.

In 1 vs 1 combat stupefy beats avada kedavra. By about 3 syllables.

Comment author: ShardPhoenix 06 July 2010 03:08:08AM 5 points [-]

Don't forget that Avada Kedavra has the advantage that it can't be blocked/mitigated/etc, whereas spells like stupefy presumably can (or that advantage of AK wouldn't be worth noting).

Comment author: JoshuaZ 06 July 2010 03:31:37AM 1 point [-]

More specifically, most spells can be blocked by the "protego" charm. AK cannot be blocked in this matter although AK can be dodged or can have a large physical object block it.

Comment author: CronoDAS 03 July 2010 08:07:01PM 2 points [-]

It was already described in detail, when Transfiguration was introduced, that transfiguring a living thing kills it...

Comment author: Vladimir_Nesov 03 July 2010 06:29:22PM *  3 points [-]

Presumably that at least allows him to break through any locks. Mastering this wandlessly will make it impossible to effectively restrain him while leaving conscious. The choice to make it possible is still on the author, because the Magic could make it impossible regardless, as it holds lots of conceptual knowledge already and can impose map distinctions of its own, however the wizard conceptualizes the situation.

Comment author: wedrifid 04 July 2010 02:40:54AM 3 points [-]

If you can prevent apparition by powerful wizards you can quite likely prevent transfiguration via a similar mechanism.

Comment author: JGWeissman 03 July 2010 06:35:16PM 4 points [-]

Unless the restraints are protected against transfiguration.

Comment author: Alicorn 03 July 2010 07:55:06PM 6 points [-]

If the ability to transform just portions of objects is completely novel, those protections might or might not extend to it.

Comment author: RobinZ 03 July 2010 02:55:23PM 4 points [-]

I'd dispute your claim about Hermione - I get that way about breaking rules sometimes, particularly when I am tired.

Comment author: MartinB 28 May 2010 03:05:11PM 2 points [-]

That is just awesome. Made my day! While reading the story i hat to laugh out loudly on almost every third sentence, much to the annoyance of my neighbors. Thats a feat no other story has accomplished so far, not even discworld - which would be the close contender.

I was also happy to learn that i figured out the solution to Harry's sleeping problem right about when it introduced. But i didn't solve the confusing morning riddle.

Comment author: Vladimir_Nesov 28 May 2010 03:21:52PM 0 points [-]

Please observe your grammar.

Comment author: Unnamed 26 July 2010 06:07:31PM 3 points [-]

Is Harry learning how to lose?

Chp 19 is when Harry went through the ordeal with Quirrell to learn how to lose.

Chp 21 he lost the textbook reading contest with Hermione and acted like a whiny sore loser, suggesting that he hadn't really learned much. He acted like such a brat that I had to assume that he'd failed to learn some basic social skills in his solitary homeschooled childhood (e.g., you should at least act like you've lost gracefully, by congratulating the winner and not complaining).

Chp 32 Harry seems to be trying to goad Draco and Hermione into cooperating with each against him in the battle, suggesting that he hopes that they work together to defeat him in the game, for the greater good (of Draco's character and their relationships). It can't happen, because the state of the game demands that Draco cooperate with Harry rather than Hermione in order to have a chance to win, but if Harry was considering it and hoping for it then that's a good sign for his learning.

Comment author: Unnamed 01 August 2010 01:08:52AM 2 points [-]

Chp 33 provides more support for this take on chp 32. Draco & Hermione threaten to cooperate against Harry if he accepts traitors, Harry openly proclaims that he'll accept traitors and challenges them to cooperate, and Quirrell is surprised by Harry's response. This makes the most sense if Harry is thinking outside the game and seeing his tactic as win-win: either he gets Draco & Hermione to cooperate (win in life), or they fail to cooperate and he has an advantage in the battle (win in the game).

Comment author: wedrifid 12 July 2010 04:05:56AM 0 points [-]

Chapter 29 - Am I alone in considering this the worst chapter yet (that is, <=29)?

The hacked in "Bill is schizophrenic" was unpleasant. Sure EY wanted to force in a 'conspiracy theory' lesson, but I still just found it distasteful. The remainder of the chapter was just uninspiring and did nothing but reinforce my growing impression that Harry doesn't have what it takes to become an ultimate "Universe Optimising" power. I don't think all of this is due to 'still needs to learn lessons' considerations either.

Ick. I'm going to read the next couple of chapters. Most of the recent comments here have focussed on the the 30,31 chapters so I'm hoping 29 was just an unremarkable interlude.

Comment author: gwern 12 July 2010 06:18:54AM 1 point [-]

The hacked in "Bill is schizophrenic" was unpleasant.

I'm still a little unsure about this. It's writing off the canon plot as a conspiracy theory, but Eliezer surely knows that sometimes conspiracies are correct (a few are stranger than fiction; besides the well known Gulf of Tonkin, there's also Operation Gladio or Propaganda Due) and that they really are out to get you. Cryonics, for example has been written off as a conspiracy theory by some.

And from a writer's perspective, it rearranges a lot of characters. Aside from Pettigrew now being dead as he's supposed to be, Sirius is now stuck in Azkaban, Bill is AWOL at Mungo's, and Remus has much less motivation to come in. My hope is that Eliezer actually has a different conspiracy cooked up which will use those characters, and it'll be a lesson in 'following the hard evidence no matter how silly/low-status/conspiratorial outsiders consider the theory' (with obvious relevance to cryonics).

Comment author: wedrifid 12 July 2010 04:34:38AM *  2 points [-]

Most of the recent comments here have focussed on the the 30,31 chapters so I'm hoping 29 was just an unremarkable interlude.

:) And I have just given chapter 30 the rating of best chapter so far. And given that I loved the early ones that is high praise!

I particularly liked the part where Draco and Potter both concluded Quirrel was on the side of 'good'.

Comment author: Sniffnoy 25 July 2010 06:15:35PM 3 points [-]

Another point in chapter 32 that could use some explaining: Why are Harry, Draco, Hermione the only ones in the running for the Christmas wish? Do Quirrell points from battles tend heavily towards the generals? (Though I guess they were all doing especially well in the class anyway...) That, and there's only one Christmas wish, for all seven years; obviously the other years are a bit outside the scope of the story, but with no explanation it still seems a bit strange that noone from those years would even come close.

Comment author: dclayh 25 July 2010 09:52:00PM 3 points [-]

Do Quirrell points from battles tend heavily towards the generals?

Yes, that was stated in a previous chapter.

Comment author: Blueberry 28 May 2010 07:20:23AM 3 points [-]

From Ch. 7:

Draco snarled. "She has some sort of perverse obsession about the Malfoys, too, and her father is politically opposed to us so he prints every word. As soon as I'm old enough to get an erection I'm going to rape that bitch."

Is this a reference to some poorly-written slash fanfic? I'm assuming Eliezer knows that boys of any age can get erections, so it must be making fun of something, but I'm missing a reference.

Similarly with:

Harry burbled on. "I'm delighted to meet you, Mr. Malfoy. Just unutterably delighted. And to be attending Hogwarts in your very year! It makes my heart swoon." Oops. That last part might have sounded a little odd, like he was hitting on Draco or something.

(Ch. 5)

Is this just making fun of Harry/Draco slash in general, or is there a specific reference?

Comment author: pozorvlak 12 July 2010 09:43:20AM 1 point [-]

As soon as I'm old enough to get an erection I'm going to rape that bitch.

Yes, I found that sentence really jarring too. Even assuming that Draco was for some reason unable to get an erection, he'd hardly admit it.

Comment author: NihilCredo 15 July 2010 01:03:48AM 1 point [-]

That sentence actually sent me on a quick Google mission to confirm that the author was a woman.

Comment author: Blueberry 26 July 2010 08:35:37AM 0 points [-]

It would have to be; a male would know that boys of any age can get an erection. Did you find the original author of that line? I couldn't find it through Google

Comment author: knb 26 July 2010 05:27:13PM *  4 points [-]

It seems plausible that Malfoy wouldn't know that. Some boys never get erections before puberty. Getting erections reliably (as opposed to accidentally) before puberty might not happen either.

Comment author: ata 27 July 2010 10:56:07PM *  1 point [-]

At this rate, Draco will be a master Bayesian before he figures out masturbation...

(sorry, sorry)

Comment author: pozorvlak 31 July 2010 10:51:02PM 1 point [-]

Actually, that was something about the original books that really bugged me: their sexlessness. Rowling captures the frustration and rage of being an adolescent boy very well, but not the lust - and that's probably deliberate. Sue Townsend's Adrian Mole books are much better in this regard.

Comment author: Cyan 01 August 2010 02:31:00AM 1 point [-]

Wow, I haven't thought of Adrian Mole in years. I enjoyed those books when I read them -- I should read them again and see how they stand up. Thanks for the reminder.

Comment author: WrongBot 26 July 2010 05:12:25PM 1 point [-]

Uh, that's Eliezer's, from one of the early chapters of MoR. Unless he's making a reference I didn't get?

Comment author: Blueberry 27 July 2010 08:55:59AM *  1 point [-]

I assumed it was a reference to the way young kids sometimes write slash fanfic when they don't know anything about sex, and they make all kinds of mistakes. There are other fanfic references, like Harry's line to Draco, "It makes my heart swoon". I don't know if it's a reference to anything specific, but NihilCredo seemed to suggest that e found it.

Comment author: NihilCredo 28 July 2010 02:50:19PM 3 points [-]

Actually, what I meant is that I cannot possibly conceive an eleven-year-old kid openly admitting that he cannot yet have an erection - he'd rather jump into a fire. It makes me wonder what kind of kids Eliezer hung out with.

In most Western societies, boys' relation with sex moves straight from "knowing nothing" to "pretending to know everything". (Wizarding Britain could be different, but there is nothing in Rowling's or Eliezer's writings to explain that.)

Comment author: NihilCredo 28 July 2010 06:56:06PM *  2 points [-]

And Eliezer has just fixed the sentence (along with a few other small tweaks to Chapter 7). Glad to see improvements!

Comment author: Furcas 29 July 2010 03:06:49AM 4 points [-]

The new sentence is a bit lacking in the original's shock value. I would have left the "that bitch" part in.

Comment author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 29 July 2010 03:19:35AM *  5 points [-]

I'm not sure the Draco I've been writing for the last few chapters would use the term "bitch" in front of Harry Potter, it doesn't sound dignified enough for the heir of Malfoy.

(But yes I did explicitly consider that alternative. If I get enough votes for keeping the shock value I'll put it back in, or figure out something, I guess.)

Comment author: Sniffnoy 28 July 2010 08:52:40PM 4 points [-]

Can we maybe get a list of these changes somewhere?

Comment author: gwern 29 May 2010 07:16:40PM 5 points [-]

I previously criticized Eliezer's 'Ultimate Mega Crossover' fic on basically the grounds that it makes him/SIAI look bad, and didn't help out the cause much.

Reading through MoR, I made a point of reading the reviews and seeing what non-LW people were saying. I'm pleased that aside from AngryParsley's site stats, many of the reviews expressed interest in LW writings and Eliezer's ideas, and very few any disgust or general opinions of low status. Good job, Eliezer!

Comment author: Kaj_Sotala 12 July 2010 02:31:27AM *  8 points [-]

The hate that the Dark Lord Potter forum has on MoR is getting more than a bit amusing.

Also, perhaps it's me, but I see the story as a thinly veiled commercial for the author's blog/institute, which breaks the "doing this for pleasure and not profit" fanfiction model (as well as being a subtext that breaks the fourth wall for several readers). The author is almost certainly deriving commercial benefit from J. K. Rowling's intellectual property and his exploitation of the popularity of her fandom by routing eyeballs to his site and building his own personal fame as a voice in the field of AI. I wouldn't be surprised if his story has bumped traffic to his blog/website by an order of magnitude or two. In many regards, this practice is worse than a Cassandra Clare or Jim Bernheimer pitching their original fiction novels on their fanfiction sites, since neither author makes a living off their writing.

This story isn't parody in the traditional sense, so it's possible that a court would consider it as not falling within this protected class of derivative works. Indeed, if the legal hammer were to fall on this story, it could have fallout: consider that a single CAD letter, if sufficiently broad in scope, to the owners of fanfiction.net could effectively shut down the fandom.

As Louie commented upon hearing this: "I just love the fountains of money that have been bursting through [SIAI]'s doors ever since the beginning of this fic". Not.

Comment author: lsparrish 12 July 2010 04:01:00PM 1 point [-]

That thread is an interesting read. Fun to see people taking this so seriously.

Personally I just like that it is educational material presented in a fun to read fashion that pokes fun at a rather silly story / fictional universe that has been forced upon us all by the engines of cultural osmosis. I have no problem with HP used as a cheap mnemonic device to memorize and illustrate a set of concepts that everyone should know but most people don't. I also don't have a problem with using it as a cheap advertising gimmick to get people to pay attention to matters that they should be paying attention to but don't. The annoyance of DLP folks at this is understandable, but somewhat hilarious from a perspective that thinks of there as being more important nerdy things to obsess over in life.

Comment author: thomblake 12 July 2010 05:07:30PM 3 points [-]

cheap mnemonic device

Yes, it seems to work great for that. I find myself saying things like, "As Lucius Malfoy would say, that sounds like the sort of plot that would work in a story but not in reality." or "That's like the time Harry Potter..."

Comment author: ata 29 May 2010 05:35:37AM *  9 points [-]

I think that, in the first few chapters, Harry did not give enough credence to the hypothesis that he was simply insane and hallucinating. I think, given the observations he had at the time (his mom claimed her sister was a witch; he got a letter implying the same; a woman levitated his dad and turned into a cat), he should have at least seriously considered it. Certainly those pieces of information are some evidence for magic, but considering what that hypothesis entails — existing scientific knowledge about physics (even at the level of abstraction that we experience directly) is so completely wrong that it's actually possible to make the universe understand human words or intentions, or there's this incredibly advanced technology that looks like it's violating the laws of physics, and it's existed for thousands of years and apparently everyone has forgotten how it works — I think an honest rationalist would have to look into the "I'm cuckoo" hypothesis.

Comment author: Alicorn 29 May 2010 06:20:12AM 16 points [-]

I'm not sure what one is supposed to do upon concluding that one is quite that cuckoo. Upon getting that far gone, what can you do? Can you even assume that your actions and words will leave your brain and impact reality in roughly the way you intend? If you are that crazy, and you try to walk across the room, will you get there? Are you in a room? Do you have legs? It might be that being as insane as all that is so game over that, whatever one's epistemic position is, one has to operate as though the observations were correct.

Comment author: gwern 03 December 2012 11:46:43PM 3 points [-]

If he was having completely full-blown auditory, visual, and tactile hallucinations (note that this is fairly unusual, for example schizophrenia apparently usually only manifests hallucinations in one modality), then what exactly could he do about it or even how would he test it?

Comment author: Qiaochu_Yuan 03 December 2012 11:42:49PM *  1 point [-]

I agree. This is why I think the Hogwarts letter is charmed to make itself sound more plausible than it should be (which would be a sensible way to ease the transition for muggleborns). Harry explicitly wonders where his own certainty that magic is real comes from and doesn't get an answer via introspection. That sounds like the effect of a weak charm to me.

Comment author: topynate 27 June 2010 01:22:40AM 10 points [-]

I just read Chapter 27. My thoughts:

"Mr. Bester" - great reference.

Harry is firmly on the 'get absolute power' path. Probably he still thinks he's being cute or knowing when he talks about becoming God. His resolution not to become the next Dark Lord doesn't look too healthy now, though.

Harry seems incapable of seeing the flaws in a moral system he apparently acquired by reading science fiction and fantasy, barring almost being Sectumsemprad by a very angry wizard. Why does he think that having read books with monomyth plots is sufficient reason to try to act like the heroes of such books - what is he, eleven years old? At the same time, he understands and can nervelessly put to use Quirrell's very subtle lesson in levels of deception. Very odd, that.

Is one of the reasons Quirrell set up those Occlumency lessons that Harry would discover for himself "how reproducible human thoughts were when you reset people back to the same initial conditions and exposed them to the same stimuli" - and thereby come to treat humans as simple machines that one can use like puppets? As a strategy to bring someone over to the Dark Side, that's brilliant.

Then we get to Harry being placed in the same conditions as Lily Potter, and reacting differently - more humanely. Because he reads science fiction! That's outrageous. Surely this kind of narrative based morality, where you imagine what the good protagonist would do and then do that, is going to be a piece of cake for Quirrell to subvert.

Comment author: gwern 29 June 2010 09:50:50AM 5 points [-]

Is one of the reasons Quirrell set up those Occlumency lessons that Harry would discover for himself "how reproducible human thoughts were when you reset people back to the same initial conditions and exposed them to the same stimuli" - and thereby come to treat humans as simple machines that one can use like puppets? As a strategy to bring someone over to the Dark Side, that's brilliant.

Indeterminate at this point. (By which I mean, even if Eliezer didn't intend Quirrel to have those reasons, he could easily make Quirrel have had those reasons.)

The reasons given earlier are quite enough to justify the lessons: Quirrel doesn't want Harry to be easily scanned by either Snape or Dumbledore for obvious reasons, and once he threw his hat in the ring, a neutral third party was the only viable option - and such a neutral third party can only remain neutral by being Obliviated since anyone in the know about Voldemort is, eo ipso, a member of one faction or another.

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 27 June 2010 01:52:59PM 14 points [-]

That was a hard swat at "The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas".

As for why Harry has such an exaggerated sense of responsibility, it might be that growing up on science fiction thing. A lot of science fiction is set up so that the hero can have a huge effect in a satisfying way. Perhaps Harry should have balanced it with reading history. On the other hand, he's living in fiction, so maybe he's right for his situation.

Lois McMaster Bujold has described sf as fantasy of political agency [1], and I think she's on to something.

I assume that shutting down Azkaban has a political solution rather than a magical or violent solution. This will be interesting to watch.

Why would Snape ask Harry for his take on Snape's past? One of the underlying premises of the story is that the smarter characters (possibly with the exception of Hermione) always have a deeper plan. Did Snape actually expect to get good advice? To be told that all his choices were correct? To have a reason to be angry at Harry? None of these make huge amounts of sense (to me, at least-- I have trouble keeping track of all the scheming), even though the scene was very emotionally effective.

This is basically my review posted to fanfiction.net-- let me know if there's a problem with reposting such here.

[1] The link goes to quite an interesting speech

Comment author: thomblake 28 June 2010 07:03:25PM *  5 points [-]

This is basically my review posted to fanfiction.net-- let me know if there's a problem with reposting such here.

Quite the opposite. I was tempted to respond to the review but had been left without an appropriate forum.

I had to go back and figure out where you thought the Omelas reference was. Harry's observation just seemed obvious to me.

As for why Harry has such an exaggerated sense of responsibility

Personally, I don't even see anything to explain. Billions of people are suffering, and at least billions are going to die, and most people are observably doing nothing about it. Harry seems to have good reason to think he's the only one that can do anything, if only because he's the only one (or one of just a few) who noticed and/or cares.

Harry is right to take responsibility for the universe's troubles, as we all should.

I assume that shutting down Azkaban has a political solution rather than a magical or violent solution.

I think Harry was just using Azkaban as an example, and there will turn out to be more of a general solution to the world's problems unless Harry finds himself dealing directly with Azkaban.

Comment author: wedrifid 30 June 2010 04:59:35PM -1 points [-]

Personally, I don't even see anything to explain. Billions of people are suffering, and at least billions are going to die, and most people are observably doing nothing about it. Harry seems to have good reason to think he's the only one that can do anything, if only because he's the only one (or one of just a few) who noticed and/or cares.

Harry's problem seems to be not that he has decided to do something about it but that he takes pride in feeling guilt over the suffering of everyone (even obscenely evil people). It is on thing to prefer to take over the universe and allow the evil people to live freely in a way that can't hurt others, but it is quite another to be all emo about it. That achieves nothing except allow harry to feel self righteous.

Comment author: EStokes 05 July 2010 05:22:10PM 4 points [-]

IMO he's not all emo about it. He is also aware of his feeling guilty about it and agrees with Neville when he says he's silly. And correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't recall him feeling proud of it.

Comment author: Unnamed 27 May 2010 06:02:38AM *  14 points [-]

Here's my take on what actually happened in the dojo incident described in chp 19.

Voldemort went there in disguise to learn the valuable martial art. He reacted badly to losing so they put him through the ordeal he described. He went along with it because he wanted to learn the martial art. The ordeal did teach him valuable lessons about losing, and he vowed to learn to control his temper and master tactics of ingratiation and supplication to better manipulate others. But he felt angry and humiliated by it (as he expected Harry to be), and also vowed to return and fulfill his revenge fantasies. So after he mastered the martial art and left the dojo, he came back openly as the Dark Lord and killed them to live out his revenge fantasies and to prevent others from learning the skills (keep science secret). He spared one student who had befriended him (and who probably stood up for him during the ordeal, like Draco to Harry), and he had that student spread the version of the tale that he wanted told (to maximize fear while hiding some of his true powers, and to deflect attention away from the value of that martial art).

Comment author: TotallyARealPerson 04 August 2010 10:26:05PM 2 points [-]

Chapter 34:

I totally think the "completely wrong ship" alluded to in the author's notes is Hermione/Griphook. It makes sense!

Comment author: orthonormal 01 August 2010 05:03:52PM *  3 points [-]

Chapter 33:

I'd come up, before, with the hypothesis that HPMoR Voldemort was actually Necessarily Evil after the fashion of Eliezer's proposed supervillain gambit, but I dismissed it by assuming that Voldemort had crossed the Moral Event Horizon already. This chapter, though, makes it very plausible again via an explicit motivation (and a Shout Out to Foundation, as well). On the other hand, Quirrell could just be playing one level above that explanation.

One thing, though: is it public knowledge that Lucius Malfoy had been a Death Eater? Because it seemed to be a very dangerous thing to say out loud (not that Quirrell need fear Lucius, but that it seems foolhardy to so easily signal that he need not fear him).

Comment author: gwern 01 August 2010 05:28:54PM *  1 point [-]

One thing, though: is it public knowledge that Lucius Malfoy had been a Death Eater?

I believe canon states that Lucius was tried in the post-Voldemort purges & Lucius's defense was that he had been under the Imperius curse.

EDIT: The Harry Potter wikia, which ought to know, seems to agree: http://harrypotter.wikia.com/wiki/Lucius_Malfoy#First_Wizarding_War

Comment author: KevinC 31 July 2010 03:05:18AM *  5 points [-]

Here's what I think will happen:

Zabini stuns himself in the name of Sunshine to create a tie. And here's why:

1) The rest of the school is very partisan about their favorite army, so it's not likely that many are betting on a tie. Zabini (through a proxy or otherwise) put all of his chips on "tie." So he will return to Hell a much richer Prince of Darkness.

1a) "Aftermath" scene: Hogsmeade. Zabini meets his broker. Hogwarts is basically a closed economy, and Zabini has now walked off with the lion's share of the student body's disposable income. He plunks his Bag of Holding on the table. "Take this and convert it to Muggle money. Then go buy unmarked silver bullion..."

2) The three Generals are tied for Quirrell points. Given what we've seen of him in this chapter, Zabini is probably in fourth place, and not too far behind. How many Quirrell points will he get for getting all three generals to play according to his plan? We see Harry and Hermione accepting, and per the Prisoner's Dilemma thing, Harry and Draco had to synchronize their moves ("cooperate") to have a chance against Hermione. This would mean that Draco is also more or less following Zabini's plan. Zabini was able to steer the battle to his personal chosen outcome, so he (as an individual) wins the battle. The betrayal rules+scoring are set up to favor individual objectives rather than army loyalty/collective goals/unity. Zabini has realized this, and acted accordingly.

3) After collecting Quirrell's wish from his come-from-behind victory (which provides a "practical" demonstration of the 2-4-6 Test, since no one, Generals included, expected Zabini to have his own victory conditions), Zabini goes to Dumbledore's office. "Well done, Blaise!" Dumbledore says. "I suppose you're here for your wish..." That is, Dumbledore has offered Zabini a wish if he could steer the battle to a tie, since that would stop a Hogwarts equivalent of a football (soccer) riot, which would be likely if one of the armies won.

4) At the Christmas feast, Dumbledore rises to announce that the three armies are being merged into a Hogwarts Army, and starting at the end of January, the HA will compete in three-way battles with Beauxbatons and Durmstrang. Per the experiment mentioned earlier with the "Eagles" and "Rattlers," the Hogwarts students are united against external foes. He and Quirrell allowed the Headmasters of the other schools to watch the battles using Quirrell screens, and their staffs liked the idea. The mock battles use more magical skills and incorporate more students than Quidditch, and are thus a better encouragement to learning. New rules could be applied to future battles. "You may use any magic item you can make (under teacher or senior-student supervision) in your battles, providing it's not dangerous." "You can use any Potion you can make," etc.

Comment author: [deleted] 01 August 2010 01:50:12AM 1 point [-]

Predictions?

Regarding the note of confusion Harry feels in Chapter 3: the Killing Curse "strikes directly at the soul", but in Voldemort's case it burned his body. More likely he never cast it at Harry Potter, and the burnt hulk they found wasn't him. He learned about the prophecy and, being smart, changed his plans rather than risk fulfilling it.

And the Source of Magic is a UFAI that optimizes the world into stories.

I hope all my predictions turn out wrong. What I want most from this story is to go on being surprised.

Comment author: [deleted] 29 July 2010 05:31:28PM 4 points [-]

Is there an annotated version of this anywhere? I know that the sequences cover most/all the stuff and am reading and have read a lot of the sequences but it seems like it might be fun to read this with descriptions of the maths/science/concepts alongside it as well as all the literary allusion noted.

Comment author: frozenchicken 26 July 2010 09:19:47AM 2 points [-]

You know, as I was reading chapter 32, I started thinking about how the three generals had their various weaknesses. Draco is savvy but weak against complexity, Hermione is bright but not exactly street smart, and Harry is clearly brilliant yet arrogant. It was only after I'd read it all that I realised each had fallen prey to their own specific weakness. Hermione was surprised by the combined 'For Sunshine!' Gambit against her, Draco didn't realise he was with the wrong Patil, and Harry encouraged earlier betrayal amongst his crew in order to protect him in the final battle, only to be surprised at the end. I figure this was probably a deliberate bit of writing on Eliezer's account, in which case I just want to say-Good job!

Comment author: NihilCredo 01 September 2010 02:04:39PM *  2 points [-]

Draco -> Terran

Hermione -> Zerg

Harry -> Protoss

?

Comment author: gwern 01 September 2010 02:33:50PM 3 points [-]

Are you mad? You are assigning the happiness & sunshine army general to the Zerg, and the general of chaos to the Protoss?

I'm starting to think you aren't actually a Starcraft player.

Comment author: NihilCredo 01 September 2010 03:08:31PM 2 points [-]

I went by frozenchicken's words rather than by my (single-player and replay-watching only) knowledge of Starcraft. "Clearly brilliant yet arrogant" is a lock for Protoss, and "bright but not exactly street smart" cannot be Terran.

Now, chaotic fighting indeed doesn't fit with the Protoss at all. But Hermione's strategy is by far the one that most parallels a hive-mind, and for all we know the semi-sentient Zerg really are all happy-go-lucky on the inside.

Comment author: lmnop 25 July 2010 11:12:36PM 7 points [-]

I'm guessing that Blaise will shoot himself in the name of Sunshine, tying all the scores. That seems like the kind of thing Dumbledore would plot. It makes the most sense from Eliezer's point of view too, in terms of leading the story in a more interesting direction.

Comment author: JenniferRM 29 July 2010 06:53:10AM 5 points [-]

And I think that would make Blaise the quadruple agent, with Dumbledore as the fourth faction, and Quirrell aware of the entire thing, masterminding his own little stanford prison experiment in order to achieve whatever ends he's ultimately aiming for.

It was interesting to see how deeply Harry got into his "General Chaos" role in this light. (Also, I think Ch. 32 was the first time I've laughed out loud over the story in a while. It was getting pretty serious and this was way more fun. The "vader/emperor voices"... I was busting up! I think this kind of hilarity at the beginning is part of why the story took off the way it did.)

Plotwise, I've been wondering lately if Eliezer might be laying the groundwork for Voldemort to turn out to actually be the good guy and maybe Harry's true challenge as a protagonist will be to recognize that rationalist!Voldemort will actually turn out to be good for the world, and deserves to be supported. I could image the army lessons turning out to have a positive global outcome if they ended in the right way, which would add a bit of support to this theory.

Comment author: gwern 29 July 2010 07:10:36AM 4 points [-]

Plotwise, I've been wondering lately if Eliezer might be laying the groundwork for Voldemort to turn out to actually be the good guy and maybe Harry's true challenge as a protagonist will be to recognize that rationalist!Voldemort will actually turn out to be good for the world, and deserves to be supported.

This is how one of Eliezer's early stories turned out: "The Sword of Good".

(There are some traces of that story in MoR - Harry early on not engaging in moral relativism is similar to the hero's final understanding of the evil of the status quo of the fantasy world. But ultimately I think Quirrelmort will be evil. Voldemort killing the entire dojo and sparing only his friend is a mortal sin and Quirrel does not exhibit the kind of heroic remorse necessary to make up for mass & serial murder. Which reminds me, we don't know who Voldemort killed to get the Horcrux on Pioneer. A security guard, probably.)

Comment author: dclayh 25 July 2010 09:57:49PM *  2 points [-]

Ch. 32. I don't know what Eliezer will have Blaise do, but if I were in that position I'd flip a coin between Harry and Draco, get rewarded by the winner and counterfactually mug the loser. (Hoping, of course, that that Draco wins, since Harry is clearly more likely to pay off a counterfactual mugger.)

ETA: That is, of course, assuming that Blaise isn't working for Dumbledore (which his chapter-ending line would seem to point to).

Comment author: Larks 30 July 2010 10:52:51PM -1 points [-]

You don't even need to flip the coin; just tell Harry you did. As Harry isn't actually Omega, this will work just as well (assuming you don't act differently)

Comment author: Larks 30 July 2010 11:59:49PM 0 points [-]

Request reason for downvote; Off-topic? Incorrect (e.g. not utility maximising)? Unclear? Sorry for whatever it was.

Comment author: Vladimir_Nesov 31 July 2010 12:03:01AM 2 points [-]

That you "don't act differently" doesn't protect you from an inference from your motive.

Comment author: cousin_it 30 July 2010 03:17:07PM *  6 points [-]

Assume that Draco and Harry both value victory at $1000. Now if you demand $800 from the winner, the loser "would have" gained only $200 in the counterfactual case, so he will pay you $200 at most. So you could have just demanded $1000 minus epsilon from the winner. We could probably prove a theorem that says counterfactual mugging can't help you extract more of the surplus economic value that you create.

Comment author: dclayh 30 July 2010 10:19:59PM *  1 point [-]

Excellent point! This is what I get for posting in haste.

ETA: However you can extract more than $1000 if you assume that at least one of Harry and Draco would rather the other of them win than Hermione. No counterfactuals needed.

Comment author: Strange7 26 July 2010 12:57:33AM 3 points [-]

Judging by the Author's Notes, my guess is that the final result is a three-way tie caused by Blaise self-terminating in the name of Sunshine.

Comment author: Sniffnoy 25 July 2010 02:23:29PM 4 points [-]

Hm, inconsistency: I just noticed that Quirrell says in chapter 16 that Quirrell points will determine generalship of armies. That seems to have been abandoned at some point?

Comment author: Sniffnoy 25 July 2010 01:53:14PM *  2 points [-]

Regarding the author's notes for chapter 32: I assume the complexity class you're looking for at the end there would be something like PromiseNP? Also, the trick really is more general than that, seeing as you can actually use it to do anything in PSPACE.

Comment author: EStokes 20 July 2010 12:51:32PM *  5 points [-]

Chapter one, when Petunia is talking about how she wanted Lily to use magic to make her prettier:

"And Lily would tell me no, and make up the most ridiculous excuses, like the world would end if she were nice to her sister, or a centaur told her not to - the most ridiculous things, and I hated her for it. And when I had just graduated, I was going out with this boy, Vernon Dursley, he was also fat and he was the only boy who would talk to me in college. And he said he wanted children, and that his first son would be named Dudley. And I thought to myself, what kind of parent names their child Dudley Dursley? It was like I saw my whole future life stretching out in front of me, and I couldn't stand it. And I wrote to my sister and told her that if she didn't help me I'd rather just -"

Just excuses? Or...? Dun dun dun...

Comment author: EStokes 20 July 2010 01:07:39PM *  3 points [-]

"McGonagall?" Harry said, once they were in the courtyard. He had meant to ask what was going on, but oddly found himself asking an entirely different question instead. "Who was the pale man? The man in the bar with the twitching eye?"

"Hm?" McGonagall said, sounding a bit surprised; perhaps she hadn't expected that question either. "That was Professor Quirrell. He'll be teaching Defense Against the Dark Arts this year at Hogwarts."

"I had the strangest feeling that I knew him..." Harry rubbed his forehead. "And that I shouldn't ought to shake his hand." Like someone he'd known a long time ago, and then been separated from... an unhappy feeling, a sense of loss.

Maybe I was just really unobservant reading the first time around, but rereading is really fun.

Ch 29

"Did you know there's a fourth-year girl in Hufflepuff who's a Metamorphmagus?" said Hermione as they headed toward the Great Hall. "She makes her hair really red, like stopsign red not Weasley red, and when she spilled hot tea on herself she turned into a black-haired boy until she got it under control again."

Pffhahahaha!

Comment author: cousin_it 19 July 2010 09:36:47AM *  4 points [-]

Up to chapter 31 now. I don't understand how Eliezer is going to paint the central conflict. Granted, Quirrell is awesome and has had several successes already. But the main motivation of the Death Eaters is blood purism (as in canon), and Harry has already proved it to be false, and our Quirrell is rational enough to agree with the proof if he hears it. So to make the central conflict happen Eliezer has to invent something else, something secret, that makes Quirrell tick.

Comment author: NaN 25 July 2010 05:28:58PM 1 point [-]

It appears that a very large number of wizards are blood purists; Quirrel might just want power, and think that the best way to achieve that is by stirring up hatred for mudbloods.

Comment author: Baughn 19 July 2010 05:36:51PM *  2 points [-]

I think he may have already done so, by way of Quirrelmort's reaction to Harry's statement that he wanted to use science.

Voldemort is scared of muggles. Quite reasonably so; despite Harry, there are enough of them that they'd very likely overtake the magic-users in a matter of decades on all useful fronts, and even now a conflict between muggles could squash the wizards like a bug.

Basically, I think he wants to

(a) Strengthen magical society to the point where they can stand up to the muggles. Harry might be helpful here, but there's a good chance their plans would conflict. Failing that..

(b) Get the hell off this rock.

Comment author: orthonormal 16 July 2010 10:59:43PM 4 points [-]

For "Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality", I'd like to make predictions that can be eventually verified publicly in time, but won't tempt the author to change things to prevent it from coming true (as is the usual way of serial writers on the Internet). I'm therefore encrypting my prediction with the md5 hash function, so that afterwards it can be verified. (One difficulty is that I have the power to edit this comment; is there a way to make it obvious if I've done so, or store it in a less editable space?) Anyway, here goes:

July 16 (after Chapter 31): 28f9e3b2165344763c35514b473cb347

Comment author: orthonormal 25 July 2010 05:23:48PM 3 points [-]

July 25 (after Chapter 32, prediction for Chapter 33):

SHA-1: f5721b3c6010973ee195dc160d0679477401a3df

Comment author: orthonormal 01 August 2010 06:05:29AM 1 point [-]

Translation:

End of 32 only listed 3 options for Zabini. The fourth creates a 3-way tie. Zabini shoots himself as traitor.

Comment author: gwern 01 August 2010 07:36:16AM 1 point [-]
 [03:35 AM] 215Mb$ echo "End of 32 only listed 3 options for Zabini. The fourth creates a 3-way tie. Zabini shoots himself as traitor." | sha1sum 09a3ee331d8900b7b7475b0a89911207672cbbda -
Comment author: ata 01 August 2010 09:10:10AM 3 points [-]

Try echo -n.

Comment author: rhollerith_dot_com 01 August 2010 09:47:50AM *  0 points [-]

When the -n flag is added to the echo command (as suggested by ata) the hash matches.

So, unless orthonormal has exploited a security vulnerability on the Less Wrong server, orthonormal has expended a costly number of computing cycles to defeat the purpose of the hash function, I misunderstand the cryptographic guarantees provided by the hash function, or something equally unlikely, orthonormal really did write the following back on 25 July:

End of 32 only listed 3 options for Zabini. The fourth creates a 3-way tie. Zabini shoots himself as traitor.

Comment author: gwern 01 August 2010 11:43:41AM 2 points [-]

Erm, yeah. I thought we all understood the hash scheme.

Comment author: JoshuaZ 25 July 2010 05:27:14PM 5 points [-]

SHA-1: f5721b3c6010973ee195dc160d0679477401a3df

Copying here to verify lack of editing in future.

Comment author: Unknowns 20 July 2010 06:14:01PM 3 points [-]

If you edit the comment a little asterisk will appear by the time stamp. Just make sure you don't do that.

Comment author: ciphergoth 20 July 2010 06:39:01AM *  3 points [-]

MD5 is utterly utterly broken and recommended against for any purpose. Use SHA-1.

EDIT: I should mention that SHA-1 is also theoretically broken and may see a demonstrated break soon, but nothing like as problematic as MD5. Until SHA-3 is agreed, the SHA-2 functions are a good stopgap where you need better security.

Comment author: kpreid 20 July 2010 05:58:55AM 3 points [-]

Did you include your own name in the text? If not, someone else can present the same hash and there's no way to tell who came up with it.

Comment author: Douglas_Knight 17 July 2010 12:06:05AM 3 points [-]

One difficulty is that I have the power to edit this comment; is there a way to make it obvious if I've done so

If you edit the comment, an asterisk will appear after the time. Compare jimrandomh's reply to the others.

Comment author: orthonormal 17 July 2010 12:46:05AM *  2 points [-]

Ah, clever.

EDIT: Let me see this for myself.

EDIT 2: Hey, it's not working yet!

EDIT 3: Duh, I had to reload the page.

Comment author: JGWeissman 16 July 2010 11:27:56PM 2 points [-]

Can you say anything (without giving away the prediction) about when you would know if it is correct or not?

Comment author: orthonormal 17 July 2010 12:44:45AM 1 point [-]

It's my guess at (some features of) the ending.

Comment author: Unnamed 16 July 2010 11:12:45PM 6 points [-]

orthonormal predicts:

July 16 (after Chapter 31): 28f9e3b2165344763c35514b473cb347

There, that's less editable for you.

Comment author: mattnewport 16 July 2010 11:08:10PM 2 points [-]

You could use Prediction Book.

Comment author: jimrandomh 16 July 2010 11:05:03PM *  4 points [-]

You can have a third party create a cryptographically signed timestamp for you. For example, secure-timestamp.org will do this. This can only be falsified by getting the timestamping server's private key or breaking its crypto algorithm. For things more important than Harry Potter predictions, you can have multiple third parties timestamp them for you, in which case falsification requires stealing all of their private keys.

Comment author: orthonormal 16 July 2010 11:01:03PM 1 point [-]

See, I'm even refusing to edit my badly written intro.

Comment author: xhale 16 July 2010 07:12:31AM 4 points [-]

620 comments is very unwieldy, especially when threaded. A new post per chapter would be less likely to cause brains like mine (that is, unlike Eliezer and Harry's, who seem to have brains built like the TARDIS) to go into terminal explosive overload.

Comment author: orthonormal 12 July 2010 12:28:32AM *  7 points [-]

Chapter 30-31: Was there a more sophisticated basic idea than appearing to be incompetent, then playing possum? I'd have expected one of the other two armies to expend a second (double tap) sleep spell on the downed, given that Neville came up with the same tactic later on.

Also, nice touch writing Neville as Bean without using a sledgehammer on the parallel.

ETA: It took me a bit to understand Draco's particular revelation: that Quirrell made sure to place all the other smartest students (and the other candidate generals mentioned in Ch. 29) on Sunshine.

Comment author: Unnamed 12 July 2010 03:14:32AM *  1 point [-]

Harry has been learning an Evil Overlord List (warning: tv tropes), but apparently he had to figure out #13 the hard way.

Coincidentally enough, today's Overcoming Bias post is about the same thing.

Comment author: gwern 12 July 2010 02:34:43AM 3 points [-]

Was there a more sophisticated basic idea than appearing to be incompetent, then playing possum?

As I argue in the reviews for chapter 31, Hermione herself was surely not playing possum, and likely neither were her 6 soldiers. That was not their idea. (Whether Nevile is smart enough to tell Harry, or whether one of the other armies will think of it in time for battle 2, is a question for the future.)

Comment author: Unnamed 12 July 2010 03:01:32AM *  6 points [-]

There were 24 people per army, and 11 of Sunshine came at Harry and 12 at Draco. And Harry & Draco had their realization of what happened when they remembered that Sunshine's soldiers went down immediately at the first shot. They were playing possum (all but Hermione, who didn't want to risk it).

The 6 soldiers left is after the battle of Sunshine's return, after they've already taken Potter hostage.

Comment author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 14 July 2010 04:36:36PM 3 points [-]

I increased the number of soldiers Hermione had left to help make this clearer.

Comment author: Mass_Driver 12 July 2010 01:20:27AM 8 points [-]

Well, Hermione wasn't just appearing to be incompetent in the sense of "too stupid to calculate the correct solution;" she was appearing to be irrational in the sense of "too self-righteous to want to calculate the correct solution."

Also, note that Hermione actually did stay true to her goals: her possum tactic allowed her to avoid "unfairly" choosing who to attack first. By waiting until most other players had been sleepified, she was able to attack only the strongest or luckiest survivors, rather than the soldiers controlled by someone that she personally disliked. She was able to both win the game and stay true to her values because she (somehow) was much better at working in groups than Draco or Harry. One wonders how a girl who had no social skills in Chapter 3 suddenly became so socially adept -- has she been reading books on how to get along with people?

Comment author: sketerpot 13 July 2010 07:26:19PM 5 points [-]

One wonders how a girl who had no social skills in Chapter 3 suddenly became so socially adept -- has she been reading books on how to get along with people?

It's more that both Harry and Draco were mentally handicapped here. Draco has the glamorous dream of being the dark overlord who controls everything from the top, his orders unquestioned and his name spoken in hushed tones. Harry has the habit of trying to think up an ingenious plan by himself, and it just didn't occur to him to get other people in his army to do strategy planning. Tactics, sure, but not strategy.

Hermione, in contrast, is perfectly used to learning from others, and doesn't have particularly grandiose ambitions. And maybe Quirrell casually hinted that some of the people in her army were good at planning things. It seems the sort of thing he'd do, to make his plan less brittle.

Comment author: Cyan 11 July 2010 05:35:21PM 1 point [-]

I wonder what Arithmancy is in this universe (or in the original Potterverse, for that matter).

Comment author: LucasSloan 12 July 2010 02:40:17AM 4 points [-]

I believe it was a method of predicting the future using math (such as adding values of letters of people's names).

Comment author: Mass_Driver 12 July 2010 02:57:59PM 2 points [-]

Wait -- then why doesn't Hermione ever explicitly predict the future in canon?

Comment author: Cyan 12 July 2010 03:24:11AM *  2 points [-]

That's what it's supposed to be in reality, but as a subject at Hogwart's, that's far from clear.

ETA: Maybe my use of the phrase "this universe" was ambiguous? I meant the fic universe, not the universe I'm currently existing in.

Comment author: Taure 12 July 2010 11:36:11AM 4 points [-]

In an interview, JKR confirmed that arithmancy at Hogwarts is as it is in real life. Only I would imagine that it actually works - otherwise there would be no basis to Hermione's claim that it's more robust and trustworthy than divination.

Comment author: Cyan 12 July 2010 02:45:54PM 1 point [-]

Awesome. Thanks!

Comment author: arundelo 09 July 2010 04:12:26AM 6 points [-]
Comment author: gwern 13 July 2010 06:07:04AM *  7 points [-]

By the way, everyone, an anon on Wikipedia is disputing mention of MoR in the Eliezer Yudkowsky article, so if you see any further reviews/discussions/mentions/links of MoR by prominent people* besides ESR & Brin, please be sure to mention them here (and maybe message me about it). You may not like Wikipedia, but people go to it for information - EY's article gets a solid 1000 hits per month.

* where I define prominent as 'has a Wikipedia article'

Comment author: Baughn 04 July 2010 12:07:56AM *  2 points [-]

I should really have mentioned this back in the appropriate chapter, but..

Remember how Harry complains that adding (consistent) time-travel makes the universe uncomputable? Leaving aside how I'm not exactly convinced of that myself, I thought I should point out that such consistent time-travel has recently been experimentally demonstrated.

Have a look at http://arxiv4.library.cornell.edu/abs/1005.2219 . It was published way too late for Harry to read it, unfortunately. :P

Comment author: Sniffnoy 04 July 2010 12:27:06AM 1 point [-]

If I'm reading this right, this isn't an experimental demonstration of time travel, rather, it's a theory of time travel, the predictions of which can be determined experimentally, and an example of such an experiment, to determine what would happen in a grandfather paradox case if the theory is correct.

Comment author: Baughn 04 July 2010 01:09:37AM *  2 points [-]

I interpreted it as stating that they had actually performed the experiment, and gotten a positive result. Am I misinterpreting something?

Comment author: Sniffnoy 04 July 2010 04:11:19AM 1 point [-]

As I understand it, their theory is that time travel is like postselection. Hence, to determine what would happen in the case of the grandfather paradox, they set up an equivalent postselection experiment. So if their theory is correct, the results of an actual grandfather paradox experiment would match the results of this simulated-via-postselection one.

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 04 July 2010 12:02:30AM 5 points [-]

Chapter 28: I wonder what happens if Harry realizes he's living in fiction, and everything he's dealing with is made of concepts rather than atoms.

Which leads me to think about the people who say that if they found they were living in a simulation, they'd try to get out. Unless the simulation is very similar to the substrate, would it be possible to get out while remaining yourself in any sense?

Back to the story: This might be an argument for checklists: Harry and Hermione should review precautions before they try anything new, should they be doing it without adult supervision. It's possible that the adults should be doing it, too.

However, the story is a good reminder that it can be hard to remember the relevant thing, even if you're very smart.

I don't think Hermione is over-reacting-- remember that they're doing stuff which is not just more potentially dangerous than children that age are permitted to do in our culture, it's more dangerous than what most adults do.

Comment author: red75 04 July 2010 07:13:03AM *  5 points [-]

I wonder what happens if Harry realizes he's living in fiction, and everything he's dealing with is made of concepts rather than atoms.

It will be weak move on Eliezer's part. As it will effectively make him the god of Harry's universe, which mean that Harry's universe cannot exist without him, that it is not self-sufficient and self-contained.

Comment author: wedrifid 04 July 2010 03:04:21AM 1 point [-]

Chapter 28: I wonder what happens if Harry realizes he's living in fiction, and everything he's dealing with is made of concepts rather than atoms.

An interesting thought... I think Harry should actually be pleased with that discovery. Given everything he knows about fictional realities and his observations thus far about the HP universe he should be more confident in his ability to achieve godhood. DND is a system that has gone through versions, with a strong motivation for making it ungamable, but there are still loopholes.

Comment author: JenniferRM 04 July 2010 04:15:34AM 9 points [-]

Since around Chapter 20 this is actually my guess for the entire basis of magic that Eliezer is working from. That is... there's a jumble of ideas and tropes that are invented and sequentially stolen by one author after another. Someone tells stories of Vlad Tepis, Bram Stoker comes along... and N iterations later you've got Twilight with vampires having extra chromosomes and clairvoyance.

To understand a magical universe at the deepest level is to see the hands of previous authors influencing your physics and history (and possibly your future if you are in a prequel) plus a "current author" who has a measure of finer grained control over things like plotting and characterization - limited by the audience's willingness to play along.

If this theory of magic is right, rationality in a magical universe should lead you to to become genre-aware, and then the next obvious(?) thing is to go meta genre-aware and start trying to "genre hack" your universe and see if you can "tunnel" into the derivative works (or maybe just get the author to fall in love with you or something).

My current working theory is that Dumbledore as figured out a rough outline of these "magical physics" and has been actively manipulating his reality for decades, with the goal of setting up pre-conditions that could create "authorial change" and/or to make a certain story easy to tell given the facts. The more pointed goal is to cause his universe would branch at a "point of interest" in a direction that, according to fictional tropes, is more likely to be to his own liking.

Based on his revelation about pranking Harry's mother, I've got a (totally unnecessarily detailed) hypothesis about what he may have done to create initial conditions for Harry Potter something like 20 or 30 years before the present story (including setting up an abusive adoptive environment) that got Rowling to pick up the canon universe and give him a victory there.

In the meantime, if the theory is true, the deeper question is whether Voldemort has the same insight, and if he (in keeping with the "bad guys are better leaders" trope) he actually told some of his henchmen about his plan for the world. I think Snape might be genre aware? And the Malfoy's are even better candidates because they could be trying to hack the universe such that Draco is the main character in a fairly standard "magical prince from fallen but ancient family, rising to up to a historically and morally appropriate place in the world". Setting Harry up as Draco's evil arch-nemesis would be a good move in this vein... Harry falls into the Lex Luthor trope and eventually loses because "that's how those stories work".

The only trick is that they are actually in a fanfic about rationality!! I'm not sure if anyone realizes that yet. Maybe Dumbledore does now? Eliezer was more obvious about the story with this bit:

"Indeed," said Dumbledore. "But Harry is the hero, so he may be able to do things that are logically impossible."

Which confirmed my hypothesis some. But my plotting hypothesis will not be supported if Dumbledore doesn't start seriously updating on the "science is starting to apply to magic" facts. I'm kind of curious why he didn't notice that Transfiguration was retconned in the first place. In the face of so much else magical chaos that Eliezer left in place that adjustment is sort of glaring. Noticing possible retcons is one of the nearly necessary skills you'd want to cultivate if you were going to genre hack.

I really hope my hypothesis bears out. I'm aware of no previous work of fiction that jootzed all the way to being genre-aware of its genre-awareness and I think it would be it would be hilarious to read one :-)

Comment author: Blueberry 04 July 2010 06:35:03AM 6 points [-]

I'm aware of no previous work of fiction that jootzed all the way to being genre-aware of its genre-awareness and I think it would be it would be hilarious to read one :-)

You'd probably enjoy "Sophie's World" and "Godel, Escher, Bach" if you haven't already read them. (One of the dialogues in GEB features pushing-potion and popping-tonic; pushing-potion moves you down a level into a work of fiction or art, and popping-tonic takes you back up a level.)

Comment author: dstorrs 25 November 2010 09:00:52AM *  1 point [-]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Number_of_the_Beast_%28novel%29

Heinlein's concept of "fictons" does exactly this.

Comment author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 04 July 2010 09:57:43AM 8 points [-]

I'm aware of no previous work of fiction that jootzed all the way to being genre-aware of its genre-awareness and I think it would be it would be hilarious to read one :-)

Yes, well, you may have to write yourself the work you always wanted to read.

Comment author: JenniferRM 04 July 2010 09:08:48PM 5 points [-]

Cryptic, with a dash of sass :-)

Is that a denial plus an exhortation to write it myself? Or is it a smug admission that you're writing what you wanted to read which is something in the ballpark of my guess?

I'm also curious if you have plans to bootstrap out of our present situation? I've run some minor "metaphysical experiments" in the past to see if the world is as strictly "object level" as it seems to be, and I've recently tried a couple micro tests inspired by your HP story to see if "this world's story has started yet" with me as a character who can break the fourth wall and get feedback, and so far they've all come back with boring results.

Comment author: Kevin 04 July 2010 05:16:42AM *  2 points [-]

I like your explanation, because it seems that the logical endpoint of your hypothesis would be my prediction that rationalist!Harry becomes Harry in the universe of the The Finale of the Ultimate Meta Mega Crossover .

If you have not read The Ultimate Meta Mega Crossover, you probably should, because it is genre-aware of its genre awareness, maybe a few more levels of meta-ness, or that kind of infinitely recursive meta-ness of this kind of selfawareness taken to the insane logical conclusions.

The spoilers for Permutation City are total -- Meta Mega Crossover contains an explanation of the ending of Permutation City. The Fire Upon the Deep spoilers aren't nearly as complete.

A link to a link to download Permutation City: http://www.imminst.org/forum/index.php?act=ST&f=13&t=15223&s=.

Comment author: wedrifid 04 July 2010 02:56:36AM 2 points [-]

Back to the story: This might be an argument for checklists: Harry and Hermione should review precautions before they try anything new, should they be doing it without adult supervision. It's possible that the adults should be doing it, too.

And this seems to be exactly what Dumbledore himself does. That is a lesson I hope we see Harry take on board for future experiments.

Comment author: gwern 04 July 2010 01:01:37AM 4 points [-]

Which leads me to think about the people who say that if they found they were living in a simulation, they'd try to get out. Unless the simulation is very similar to the substrate, would it be possible to get out while remaining yourself in any sense?

Sure. Escape into another simulation.

More seriously, obviously it's not guaranteed that an organism in a simulation can just create a copy in the outside world. How would a Game of Life organism, made out of glider guns and flashers and whatnot, made an atom-based form of itself?

What it could do is create something isomorphic. Whether this is possible is pretty much the same question as whether humans can make uploads. (Which is the inverse, actually - going from 'reality' to 'simulation'.)

Comment author: wedrifid 04 July 2010 02:51:10AM 2 points [-]

More seriously, obviously it's not guaranteed that an organism in a simulation can just create a copy in the outside world. How would a Game of Life organism, made out of glider guns and flashers and whatnot, made an atom-based form of itself?

Absolutely. It'll just take a superintelligence and some nano-tech.

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 04 July 2010 02:50:35AM 4 points [-]

Alternatively, you keep living in your simulation, but you get enough of a handle on the substrate that you can make changes in your simulation, protect it, or duplicate it.

Comment author: wedrifid 03 July 2010 12:27:13PM 5 points [-]

Wow. I liked 28! Well, I liked all but 1 of the previous 27 too but this one was brilliant. Just the right balance of overconfident recklessness combined with not being a stubborn fool when realizing his mistake. By right balance I mean for realism given the character. Harry being such an emotionally unstable prick was a little irritating until he started showing clear signs of being aware of his emotional foibles and the rather important ability to take care of important relationships despite his weakness.

Comment author: wedrifid 03 July 2010 11:31:36AM *  3 points [-]

Harry's knuckles had gone white on his wand by the time he stopped trying to Transfigure the air in front of his wand into a paperclip. It wouldn't have been safe to Transfigure the paperclip into gas, of course, but Harry didn't see any reason why it would be unsafe the other way around. It just wasn't supposed to be possible. But why not? Air was as real a substance as anything else...

Well, maybe that limitation did make sense. Air was disorganized, all the molecules constantly changing their relation to each other. Maybe you couldn't impose a new form on substance unless the substance was staying still long enough for you to master it, even though the atoms in solids were also constantly vibrating all the time...

The more Harry failed, the colder he felt, the clearer everything seemed to become.

The cold feeling should have given him an idea! He has a spell for lowering temperature. Unless it is, for example, helium a gas with sufficiently low temperature tends to prefer to go by the name 'solid' (Depending on cooling speed probably isolating one specific component of air). That gives him a two step process for transfiguring gas into paperclips.

Mind you, Harry most likely doesn't have the magical ability right now to lower temperature that effectively. Perhaps that's where Hermione's idea to actually practice magic comes into play!


Instant godhood by inventing nano-tech? That doesn't seem to leave much scope for names for all the levels of power that are far ahead of mere non-replicating nano. Perhaps demi-god? Even that seems to be overstating things. It seems to be on a par with the potential of the most advanced magic applied intelligently but without Harry's munchkin mentality.


A thought regarding Alzheimer's cures: If you are playing around with creating an Alzheimer''s cure with transfiguration and find yourself thinking more clearly all of a sudden be very afraid. You have probably absorbed some of the transfigured substance. Most chemical cures for Alzheimer's will also improve abstract and creative thought in healthy humans.

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 30 June 2010 08:33:37PM 2 points [-]

Shouldn't Slughorn be trying to get Harry into his social circle very soon after Harry's substantial victory over Snape?

Comment author: wedrifid 01 July 2010 01:23:59AM *  1 point [-]

Definitely, especially since Harry should be looking him up and courting him early on!

"I'm the boy who lived! Let's have a tea party. We'll invite Draco (not in disrepute yet) and Hermione."

I wonder if Harry will start making that sort of move soon. It seems to be the kind of lesson that HP:MoR may like to impart.

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 01 July 2010 02:03:55AM 2 points [-]

It's been a while since I've read the book. I don't know whether Slughorn would be amenable to such a direct approach, or would prefer to make the first move. If the latter, Harry would need to be more subtle.

Comment author: wedrifid 01 July 2010 03:00:27AM *  1 point [-]

Much of Slughorn's reticence was the result of the return of Voldemort and the resurrected Death Eater public face. But you are right nontheless. Perhaps it would be better to work his way in via other members of the slug club for example.

Comment author: gwern 30 June 2010 10:26:04PM 4 points [-]

Sure, but how many days have passed? Not very many. And Slughorn is retired. Harry's exploits in books 1-5 are even more impressive than this Harry's maneuvering, and yet look how late on Slughorn is first introduced.

Comment author: thomblake 30 June 2010 02:28:04PM 1 point [-]

Chapter 27

A lot of folks seem to make a big deal out of Harry not understanding Snape's "racist" comment. Which is very strange to me, as I had no idea it had that sort of implication (though it's obvious in retrospect), and (while I'm no expert) I'm much more familiar with the HP canon than Harry is. "Mudblood" always sounded more to me like making fun of someone for being poor.

Comment author: CronoDAS 30 June 2010 03:25:28PM *  5 points [-]

"Mudblood" is supposed to be the equivalent of "nigger".

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 30 June 2010 08:40:09PM *  1 point [-]

The word doesn't have the same meaning now that it had 50 or 75 years ago. Which do you have in mind?

Comment author: Alicorn 30 June 2010 06:52:52PM 6 points [-]

It doesn't seem at all clear to me that this is realistic. The victims of the insult are, just about by definition, the ones who weren't raised in wizarding culture, and no earlier than age eleven do they hear this particular insult. Even though the components of the word "mudblood" are certainly impolite, I don't think it could cut as deep as a slur that floats around one's childhood environment and that one's parents are familiar with reacting to and so on.

Comment author: Blueberry 30 June 2010 09:44:30PM 2 points [-]

No, it's not a direct equivalent, because the societies are somewhat different, but the racial analogue is clear, and comparing "mudblood" to "nigger" (or maybe "fag") is probably the closest analogy we have.

Also, the term can be used as an insult even to non-Muggleborns, who presumably have grown up with it. In fact, that seems to be how it's usually used to greatest effect. And the Muggleborns are transplanted from everyone and everything they know when they come to Hogwarts, so in some sense they have a new childhood environment with brand-new associations to be learned.

Comment author: mattnewport 30 June 2010 09:54:54PM *  4 points [-]

the racial analogue is clear

It seems like a class rather than race thing to me. Maybe this is partly because class divisions are more salient to me than race divisions with my British upbringing but given Harry Potter is a British creation I think class is likely to be the the closest analogy. It's the kind of treatment that a scholarship kid from a working class background would get in a public school. The fact that Hogwarts is modeled after public schools lends weight to this theory.

Comment author: Blueberry 30 June 2010 11:29:38PM -2 points [-]

It seems like a class rather than race thing to me. Maybe this is partly because class divisions are more salient to me than race divisions with my British upbringing but given Harry Potter is a British creation I think class is likely to be the the closest analogy.

In America, our classes are called races.

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 01 July 2010 12:20:25AM 3 points [-]

It's more complicated than that.

Comment author: gwern 30 June 2010 10:21:55PM 3 points [-]

I don't buy the class analogue.

Aside from the racial (magical) view being perfectly consistent with everything in canon (magical/non-magical seems to override even xenophobia, witness the foreign schools' reception in Goblet of Fire), we also have a perfect example of one group of people who suffers from both class and racial discrimination: the Weasleys.

The Weasleys are presented as being mocked (particularly by the Malfoys) both for being poor - lower class, note also that their red hair suggests Irish roots - and for linking themselves with Muggles and eventually intermarrying with Mudbloods. If the 2 were one and the same, we would not see any difference.

Comment author: mattnewport 30 June 2010 10:36:40PM 0 points [-]

I can't really pretend to be much of an expert on Harry Potter - I've seen several of the movies but I've never read any of the books. From what I've seen however the parallels to class in British society are clear while the racist connotations are less apparent to me. Discrimination based on physical features common to an ethnic group seems to me to be an essential component of racism which is largely absent in the movies.

In Britain wealth and class are correlated but distinct. The concepts of the nouveau riche and the distressed gentry are examples of how the concepts of wealth and class are not identical.

Comment author: WrongBot 01 July 2010 01:00:09AM 4 points [-]

I think it may be a bit of both. A large part of the negative sentiment towards muggleborns seems to come from the purebloods viewing them as interlopers into a superior culture that has no place for them, for which the nouveau riche are the perfect analogy. But at the same time, the conflict has a great deal to do with ancestry and heredity; Voldemort and his coterie, evil bigots that they are, want to stop the muggleborn outsiders from diluting their superior bloodlines, a clear echo of various racist ideologies. The tie is made even more explicit by Rowling's depiction of Grindelwald, Voldemort's predecessor as a Dark Lord and pureblood supremacist, who has a biography that carefully echoes Adolf Hitler's. Rowling is sometimes unsubtle.

(Disclaimer: I've read an embarrassing amount of fanfiction, and have sometimes been known to confuse canon and fanon.)

Comment author: mattnewport 01 July 2010 01:03:05AM *  1 point [-]

Ancestry and heredity are a big part of class in Britain (and some other cultures with a strong class or caste element) but are not about race.

Comment author: WrongBot 01 July 2010 01:40:14AM 5 points [-]

This is true, and the blood-purity issue is not entirely analogous to race. But Rowling went to quite a bit of effort to line her bad guys up with the Nazis. (Grindelwald ended up imprisoned in a place called Nurmengard, even!)

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 30 June 2010 09:01:03PM 2 points [-]

There are (at least) two aspects to an insult-- likelihood of emotional pain, and amount of implied threat.

Comment author: thomblake 30 June 2010 03:28:36PM 1 point [-]

Yes, it's apparent that in-universe folks and fans react that way sometimes, but I didn't get that at all from the first few movies or first book.

Comment author: CronoDAS 01 July 2010 02:05:39AM 1 point [-]
Comment author: NancyLebovitz 30 June 2010 08:30:59PM *  3 points [-]

I'll suggest that the Wiemar republic may be a better analogy than any period in American history.

The anti-Mudblood campaign is revving up in Lily's time, and it's reasonable to see a serious threat there.

However, it's conceivable that Harry simply doesn't know much about wizarding world history. He's certainly been busy enough with other things.

Comment author: lmnop 30 June 2010 04:38:31PM *  3 points [-]

Mudblood can only be used to refer to muggle-born witches and wizards, making it a strictly racial and not socioeconomic term; many muggleborns, including Hermione, are actually quite well off. And it is definitely a big deal. Did you miss the gigantic brawl that ensued after Malfoy first called Hermione a Mudblood? I believe Ron was vomiting slugs for a day afterwards.

Comment author: thomblake 30 June 2010 05:19:43PM 0 points [-]

See, I figured that brawl was all just the Weasleys overreacting because they're stupid.

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 30 June 2010 08:51:49PM 4 points [-]

You should leave the possibility open that they're more familiar with the wizarding world than you are.

Comment author: thomblake 30 June 2010 09:04:03PM 2 points [-]

I meant that was the interpretation I had when I first read it. If I were to replace "mudblood" with "pig" or "ugly" or something, that scene would have been no more confusing to me, as I thought those Gryffindor folks were the sorts to fly off the handle and get violent in response to a simple insult.

Comment author: wedrifid 29 June 2010 09:14:16AM 8 points [-]

What happened to the Harry from Chapter 6?

"Um," Harry said, "can we go get the healer's kit now?"

McGonagall paused, and looked back at him steadily. "And if I say no, it's too expensive and you won't need it, what happens?"

Harry's face twisted in bitterness. "Exactly what you're thinking, Professor McGonagall. Exactly what you're thinking. I conclude you're another crazy adult I can't talk to, and I start planning how to get my hands on a healer's kit anyway."

A time turner is a superior to a healer's kit in very nearly every way and by a huge margin. Yet all Harry does when he loses free access to his time turner he sulks a little and that's all. He doesn't plan at all! I don't even recall one line of introspection on the subject! It takes very little ingenuity to to react:

"Harry, give me your time t..."

shit. shit. shit. Activate time turner. Escape. Then, he can spend five minutes and think up a dozen ways to retain time travel capability. Let me see...

  • Create a fake...
    • Lie to Hermione to get assistance?
    • Transfiguration not likely to work, given the teacher responsible.
  • assume that wizarding security is crap and guess (correctly) that he can probably steal one if needed...
  • actually leave Hogwarts because the time turner is more important and money can buy a better education anyway.
  • Ask Fred and George to discover a way for him to hide, to give him more time to plan.
  • Leave Hogwarts for a week.
    • Fill Gringots with silver.
    • Use money to buy a time turner on the black market
    • Also buy that hand-light that Malfoy bought.
    • And in general a stockpile of the most powerful and useful artifacts available.
    • And the best trunk that can be found anywhere or created for cash.
    • Return to Hogwarts if they will accept him after the week is up. (Or, for that matter, do it in the holidays. There isn't that much of a rush.)
    • If circumstances demand, buy an education from one (or all) of the other schools.
    • Hire all the best tutors available for all subjects and use them to supplement school education with or without the cooperation of any teacher at the school, further insulating him from the ability of the teachers to f@#% with him or take his stuff.

Really... the best Harry can come up with is to say "that's not fair"? WTF?

Comment author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 30 June 2010 01:32:57AM *  4 points [-]

"Harry, give me your time t..."

shit. shit. shit. Activate time turner. Escape.

...don't take this the wrong way, but even Harry knows better than that.

If you genuinely think this is a smart thing to do in real life, it makes me seriously worry about your safety and the safety of people around you.

Comment author: wedrifid 30 June 2010 09:14:26AM *  3 points [-]

...don't take this the wrong way, but even Harry knows better than that.

There is NO DOWN SIDE!

It may be best to hand over the time turner but you do so after having a chance to think it through. Time turner. Plan. Decide that it is better to hand over the device for now. Write your analysis down. Give it to yourself at the appropriate time. (And give it to yourself again to make the loop stable.)

If you genuinely think this is a smart thing to do in real life, it makes me seriously worry about your safety and the safety of people around you.

I have offended you by questioning the rationality of your fictional persona. My own safety is not in any danger. Every other exceptional use that Harry put the device to is risky and I would not do any of them. But giving himself a chance to think through his options in a way that would not be detected by anyone else is the trivially correct strategic option.

My own safety is secure in the short term, and medium term (human life span) but for the long term the threats to my life are human mortality and existential risk. And that's kind of what I've been counting on you to take care of (with any contribution that I could hope to make purely financial). That being the case, this conversation is quite literally scaring me. I'm not quite there yet, but the key quote from Snape is at least springing to my mind: "And I no longer trust your cunning."

Examples of stupid things to do with a Time Turner:

  • Throw pies at people through misguided altruism. It would be better to let them break your finger. You're at Hogwarts... a 5th year Luna could fix it.
  • Have a dramatic stand off over a rememberall. *If it is so important... use the time turner to find and or steal the thing beforehand and leave it somewhere Neville will find. I mean seriously... using a time turner in a way that is detectable is for *emergencies!
  • Disappearing acts from a class room. Of all the things to do with a Time Turner in that situation making a bigger scene is not one of them. At the very least, if you must refuse to be bullied, write yourself a note telling yourself to not attend potions and make another arrangement. It would be much easier to convince Dumbledore to allow Harry to hire potion tutors than have a full on confrontation.
  • Not using the time turner to go back and prevent the entire situation, after writing a great big essay to your past self on what happens if you mess with those in power.

Now, all the above mistakes are credible for Harry to make. At least, they fit the needs of the story. But using the turner to give yourself time to think at a critical moment... not on the list. And make no mistake, giving up one of the most powerful super-powers (even in the weakened 6h form) is an extremely critical moment.

But now another lesson from Harry Potter: MOR occurs to me: Always be sure you know exactly what you are both talking about. I may well be missing Eliezer's real message.

If you genuinely think this is a smart thing to do in real life, it makes me seriously worry about your safety and the safety of people around you.

What are we really talking about here? Being as EY may be several levels ahead of me the intended 'this' could be "implying that a respected authority is obviously wrong without a clear benefit to yourself". That would make for extremely good advice, and a valid concern. Fortunately I for most part avoid that in real life. It does cost me and I do limit my options such that my environment doesn't put me in that situation too often. One way to ensure my safety is to not put myself in situations that prompt risk taking. It isn't optimal, except in the bounded sense, but it does work.

Comment author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 30 June 2010 07:33:39PM 3 points [-]

Time travel in this universe has a consistent single line; once McGonagall sees Harry disappear, he can't undo it.

Comment author: Vladimir_Nesov 30 June 2010 11:37:57PM *  2 points [-]

Only because you termed that event "real", but the characters can't know that it is.

Comment author: Wei_Dai 30 June 2010 08:18:27PM *  7 points [-]

once McGonagall sees Harry disappear, he can't undo it.

Sounds like UDT might be applicable here. Here's a time-traveling version of Counterfactual Mugging:

Harry appears to McGonagall and tells her, "If you give me 1 Galleon now, I'll go back in time and hand you 100 Galleons an hour ago." Suppose McGonagall does not recall being handed 100 Galleons an hour ago. What should she do?

Here's my analysis. Suppose McGonagall decides not to give Harry 1 Galleon, then there are two possible consistent timelines for this universe. One where McGonagall gets 100 Galleons, and one where she doesn't. How does the universe "choose" which one becomes reality? I don't know but let's say that the two possibilities have equal chance of being true, or get equal amount of "reality juice".

Given the above it seems clear that McGonagall would prefer to have pre-committed to "give 1 Galleon even if not handed 100 Galleons an hour ago" since that would make the "not get 100 Galleons" timeline inconsistent. I think that's also UDT's output (although I haven't written down the math to make sure).

ETA: I didn't follow the previous discussion closely, so this might not apply at all to it. Hopefully, in that case the above is of interest in its own right. :)

Comment author: Blueberry 30 June 2010 08:30:13PM 0 points [-]

Suppose McGonagall does not recall being handed 100 Galleons an hour ago. What should she do?

Precommit, give him the Galleon, then reach in her bag to get the 100 Galleons. (She must have been Obliviated; otherwise, she would remember.)

You can actually get around a lot of the problems with time travel by taking advantage of the difference between observation and reality. For instance, if you see one of your friends die, you can go back in time, save him, then plant a fake double so you still have the same observations.

Comment author: topynate 01 July 2010 12:20:02AM *  5 points [-]

Seems straightforward to me. McGonagall knows that she does not recall being handed 100 Galleons an hour ago, so the three states of the world with high probability are: 1) She is not in a universe where she will hand Harry 1 Galleon, 2) She is in a universe where she hands Harry 1 Galleon and Harry breaks the agreement, or 3) She is in a universe where she hands Harry 1 Galleon and Harry keeps the agreement in a way that leaves her unable to recall this happening. By not handing Harry a Galleon, she will ensure that she is in universe 1. By handing Harry a Galleon, she will find herself in universe 2 or 3. She should therefore give Harry a Galleon if she judges it less than 99 times more likely that Harry will break the agreement than fulfil it in a way consistent with her experience.

As Harry has access to a time machine, he doesn't need to decide to give her 100 Galleons before he gets the 1 Galleon, so the situation is quite different to one based on predicting her actions, as Omega does in the Counterfactual Mugging. Rather it has most of the properties of the forward-time version of the gambit: "If you give me 1 Galleon now, I'll hand you 100 Galleons in one hour", except that McGonagall has a big piece of evidence that the promise will be broken, namely that she doesn't remember it being kept.

Comment author: Sniffnoy 30 June 2010 09:45:13AM *  4 points [-]

It may be best to hand over the time turner but you do so after having a chance to think it through. Time turner. Plan. Decide that it is better to hand over the device for now. Write your analysis down. Give it to yourself at the appropriate time. (And give it to yourself again to make the loop stable.)

You seem to misunderstand how the time-turner works (or at least, how it's been suggested it works). You don't get to overwrite anything; the universe doesn't "end up in" a stable state that results from using it; there isn't any meta-time (or at least, we've seen nothing to suggest such). If he were going to use the time turner to give himself advice, he would have already gotten the advice. And having used the time-turner right there and visibly, he couldn't use it "later not use it there" and have his going back in time undetectable.

A possible way he could use the time turner to help himself in this case would be to ask to go to the bathroom or somesuch, use the time turner, use the extra time to think, and then return to the room shortly after he left having thought about things.

(Edit: But this would be pretty obvious, and McGonagall probably wouldn't let him leave the room with the time turner in any case.)

Comment author: RichardKennaway 30 June 2010 10:36:47AM *  6 points [-]

You seem to misunderstand how the time-turner works (or at least, how it's been suggested it works). You don't get to overwrite anything; the universe doesn't "end up in" a stable state that results from using it

My interpretation of the "DO NOT MESS WITH TIME" incident was that you can try setting things up so that temporal consistency implies the result you want, but actually ruling out every other possibility whatever, including vast classes of outcomes you never even imagined, is next to impossible, at least for an 11-year-old boy, however smart. It hadn't even occurred to him that there was a problem in his reasoning when he tried the experiment that gave him "the scariest result ever in the history of science". Temporal consistency in the presence of time loops is another blind idiot god, far more swift and powerful than evolution.

Anyway, he still has the Time-Turner. All that stands between him and it is a magical lock. How difficult can that be for him to get around? No, actually what stands between him and it is the author's necessity not to unbalance the plot by giving him a get-out-of-jail-free card.

Comment author: Vladimir_Nesov 30 June 2010 02:23:48PM *  4 points [-]

Harry's error in the experiment was responding to "DO NOT MESS WITH TIME" with the same. If he didn't have the property of responding to that message with the same, that message wouldn't appear.

Actually, this whole consistency-based time travel seems to be an extremely expressive thought experiment infrastructure for thinking about Newcomb-like problems and decision theories able to deal with them. Maybe I should do a top-level post on that (I don't have a sufficiently clear picture of the setting, so I might be wrong about its potential)... Though I consider that happening unlikely, so other people who understand UDT are welcome to try.

Comment author: wedrifid 30 June 2010 04:53:44PM 1 point [-]

I was thinking exactly the same thing. After getting my head around the implications it seems to be an extremely intuitive way of handling such problems. I didn't write a post myself since I have yet to look close enough at UDT to be able to explain the difference between UDT and TDT.

Comment author: wedrifid 30 June 2010 12:55:10PM 2 points [-]

My interpretation of the "DO NOT MESS WITH TIME" incident was that you can try setting things up so that temporal consistency implies the result you want, but actually ruling out every other possibility whatever, including vast classes of outcomes you never even imagined, is next to impossible, at least for an 11-year-old boy, however smart. It hadn't even occurred to him that there was a problem in his reasoning when he tried the experiment that gave him "the scariest result ever in the history of science". Temporal consistency in the presence of time loops is another blind idiot god, far more swift and powerful than evolution.

I think you summed that up perfectly. I would have liked to see a little more of that explanation in the Fan Fic. It would make the story feel more natural and also be a perfect excuse to include the 'blind idiot god' kind of message.

Anyway, he still has the Time-Turner. All that stands between him and it is a magical lock. How difficult can that be for him to get around?

Without Hermione backing him up? I think he'd struggle. Harry just isn't that smart! He really should be spending more time sweet talking her. Well intentioned genius with ambition that doesn't involve gaining power... just the kind of ally Harry needs.

No, actually what stands between him and it is the author's necessity not to unbalance the plot by giving him a get-out-of-jail-free card.

Uh huh. It's even worse than if Harry had actually gone and made himself rich on day 1!

Comment author: LucasSloan 01 July 2010 07:41:51AM 2 points [-]

made himself rich on day 1!

He has been rich since day 1, it just that all his money is tied up in a variety of non-liquid "investments."

Comment author: Alicorn 29 June 2010 06:10:06PM 2 points [-]

McGonagall went a fair way towards earning Harry's respect, with her behavior about the med kit among other things; he is inclined to tolerate (with however much whining) her authority, particularly on school grounds.

Comment author: wedrifid 29 June 2010 07:44:00PM 5 points [-]

Respect is all well and good... sure, maybe he will do some detention some time. But this is a matter of survival and something that can help him in a broad manner to achieve just about all his goals.

This is compared to Snape who.... said some things that might hurt Harry's feelings.

Harry isn't acting like a rationalist. He's acting like a nerdy ape.

Comment author: CronoDAS 29 June 2010 08:09:56PM *  5 points [-]

He's eleven years old.

Comment author: wedrifid 29 June 2010 08:37:23PM 4 points [-]

He is a week older than he was a week ago. So again I wonder what happened to the Harry from chapter 6?

Comment author: CronoDAS 29 June 2010 09:09:06PM 2 points [-]

I think he doesn't want to become a criminal by stealing the Time Turner.

Comment author: wedrifid 29 June 2010 09:13:44PM *  3 points [-]

This doesn't warrant one sentence worth of inner dialog? Seriously not buying it. It's a different Harry hacked together for a different parable and as a plot hack to get rid of the Get Out Of Jail Free Card of Awesomeness +4.

Comment author: red75 30 June 2010 03:28:04AM 0 points [-]

Timeturner awesomeness for jail escape is pretty much discounted, when jailers know that one has it. And Harry risks being put under constant supervision because of his apparent disability of infancy.

Comment author: wedrifid 30 June 2010 09:21:28AM *  1 point [-]

Timeturner awesomeness for jail escape is pretty much discounted, when jailers know that one has it.

It never occurred to me to consider it a literal way to escape from jails. That's nearly useless. Instead, I consider it, among other things, as a nearly universally more effective med. kit. If someone just fell off the roof would you rather be able to bandage them up a bit or go back and tell them to watch their step?

And Harry risks being put under constant supervision because of his apparent disability of infancy.

... a good reason to not do things that are infantile... and when you do slip up you go back and give yourself a scolding so that you never do the infantile thing in the first place (but still give your past self the scolding note).

Comment author: red75 30 June 2010 01:09:01PM 0 points [-]

As Eliezer said already, timeturner can't change the past. One generally can't even calculate probability of desired outcome of timeturning... Ouch. This is discussed already.

Comment author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 30 June 2010 09:48:24AM 7 points [-]

Good heavens, Mr. Wedrifid, you can't change time! Do you think students would be allowed Time-Turners if that was possible? What if someone tried to change their test scores?

Comment author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 30 June 2010 01:31:42AM 8 points [-]

He can't have inner dialogue during that section, it's in Minerva's point of view!

Comment author: wedrifid 30 June 2010 12:41:24PM 4 points [-]

That's a good reason. So are you saying that Harry actually did do a thorough analysis of his optimal strategy for securing the benefits of time travel for "actually 5 minutes" at some stage but we just don't hear about it? This would make the situation credible.

Comment author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 30 June 2010 10:44:01PM 3 points [-]

No, Harry's experimental result scared the hell out of him and he decided not to do any more clever experiments until he was fifteen.

This is actually more rational than what you are advocating.

Comment author: CronoDAS 30 June 2010 04:29:28AM 1 point [-]

That's a good answer.

Comment author: AdeleneDawner 29 June 2010 09:47:41PM 0 points [-]

I guess you could argue that it wasn't criminal to do so, but he had no qualms about stealing gold from his bank vault.

Comment author: CronoDAS 29 June 2010 10:16:16PM 4 points [-]

I mean that he doesn't want to deal with the consequences of being known to have stolen a valuable artifact; in other words, he doesn't to be a fugitive from the wizard police.

Comment author: Unnamed 30 June 2010 06:57:13PM 8 points [-]

First, Harry discovered a gag beverage that he thought could be a key to power, although he quickly realized the Comed-Tea wasn't as powerful as it seemed. A few days later he fell in love with a device that is sometimes given to students who want to take extra classes, although he has since discovered some limits to its powers. If he goes rogue over his Time-Turner's crippleware, then who knows how much other cool and useful magical stuff he will miss out on, and how much trouble he'll be in.

Plus, McGonagall had him cornered when she confronted him about returning the Time-Turner - whatever he tried to do, she'd see it. Also, McGonagall had earned some degree of trust & respect from Harry, she's correct about Harry repeatedly misusing the Time-Turner, and she'd already warned him that they'd take it away. So it's not unreasonable to go along with the punishment, and try to earn her trust back so that his Time-Turner can be restored later on.

Comment author: RobinZ 28 June 2010 01:38:49PM 2 points [-]

Just because I never read the original material - in Chapter 27:

"And you wanted to see the results of your test firsthand," said Harry. "So. Am I like my father?"

A strange sad expression came over the man, one that looked foreign to his face. "I should sooner say, Harry Potter, that you resemble -"

Severus stopped short.

...is the name he doesn't say Remus Lupin?