Annoyance comments on So you say you're an altruist... - Less Wrong

11 Post author: John_Maxwell_IV 12 March 2009 10:15PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (106)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: John_Maxwell_IV 13 March 2009 06:22:58AM 1 point [-]

If you dislike my definition of asshole, please provide a new one. I'm genuinely interested to hear what you come up with. Remember, my definition applies only at the decision-making level: if you don't have a native capability to care for others but you emulate such a capability, you're no asshole in my book.

Comment author: Annoyance 13 March 2009 03:58:06PM 3 points [-]

"if you don't have a native capability to care for others but you emulate such a capability, you're no asshole in my book."

Why should I want to emulate such a capability?

Comment author: John_Maxwell_IV 13 March 2009 05:20:55PM 1 point [-]

To make the world a better place, perhaps?

Comment author: Annoyance 14 March 2009 05:25:42PM 2 points [-]

All right: why should my definition of 'better' involve caring for others?

Comment author: John_Maxwell_IV 14 March 2009 08:01:12PM 5 points [-]

Well, if you really don't care at all for other people, I don't think there's much I can do to bring you around. All I can say is that suffering is suffering and pleasure is pleasure, even if you aren't the one experiencing it.