= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
xamdam comments on Open Thread June 2010, Part 3 - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (606)
In addition to theoretical objections, I think the majoritarian argument is factually wrong. Remember, 'future is here, just not evenly distributed'.
http://www.google.com/trends?q=singularity shows a trend
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/13/business/13sing.html?pagewanted=all - this week in NYT. Major MSFT and GOOG involvement.
http://www.acceleratingfuture.com/michael/blog/2010/04/transhumanism-has-already-won/
Re: "http://www.google.com/trends?q=singularity shows a trend"
Not much of one - and also, this is a common math term - while:
"Your terms - "technological singularity" - do not have enough search volume to show graphs."