Psychohistorian comments on Defeating Ugh Fields In Practice - Less Wrong

65 Post author: Psychohistorian 19 June 2010 07:37PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (94)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Psychohistorian 22 June 2010 03:17:42AM *  6 points [-]

I appreciate the Devil's Advocacy. The simple issue, though, is that if you use a definition of "rational" that encompasses this behaviour, you've watered the word down to oblivion. If the behaviour I described is rational, then, "People who act always act rationally," is essentially indistinguishable from, "People who act always act." It's generally best to avoid having a core concept with a definition so vacuous it can be neatly excised by Occam's Razor.