JenniferRM comments on Defeating Ugh Fields In Practice - Less Wrong

65 Post author: Psychohistorian 19 June 2010 07:37PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (94)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: pricetheoryeconomist 21 June 2010 04:25:19PM *  8 points [-]

"These are people whose utility function does not place a higher utility on 'dieing but not having to take my meds'."

Why are you making claims about their utility functions that the data does not back? Either people prefer less to more, knowingly, or they are making rational decisions about ignorance, and not violating their "ugh" field, which is costly for them.

How is that any different than a smoker being uncomfortable quitting smoking? (Here I recognize that smoking is obviously a rational behavior for people who choose to smoke).

Comment author: JenniferRM 22 June 2010 09:39:23PM *  3 points [-]

Your posts under this name have the potential for some hilarious and educational trolling, though you have some stiff competition if you want to be the best.

You should probably refine your approach a little bit. Links to the literature would give you more points for style. Also, the parenthetical aside was a bit much - it made the trolling too obvious.