Tyrrell_McAllister comments on Surface syllogisms and the sin-based model of causation - Less Wrong

13 Post author: PhilGoetz 19 June 2010 04:40PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (49)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Tyrrell_McAllister 19 June 2010 04:50:14PM 1 point [-]

There is a significant difference between BP and Carson that has nothing to do with sin or morality:

Many more human decisions lie between Carson writing her book and factory workers losing their jobs. Carson just made a persuasive case. Other people decided to accept the case and to implement bans, which in turn led to people losing jobs. In contrast, the only human decisions in the causal node just prior to the spill were BP's, and no human decisions stand between the oil spill and the fishers being unable to fish. That, at least, is the common conception of the chain of events.

Comment author: PhilGoetz 19 June 2010 04:56:05PM 5 points [-]

As I said in the post, it is reasonable for BP to pay the fishers. The post is about the reasoning regarding the oilmen.