Vladimir_Nesov comments on What if AI doesn't quite go FOOM? - Less Wrong

11 Post author: Mass_Driver 20 June 2010 12:03AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (186)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Vladimir_Nesov 22 June 2010 10:22:36PM *  0 points [-]

Both we and the smiley-face maximizer would be better off if we did allow it to be built, and then it gives our preferences some control (enough for us to be better off than the no-AI future). It's not clear that this opportunity for trade can be realized, but we should spend some time thinking about it before ruling it out.

Sounds like Drescher's bounded Newcomb. This perspective suddenly painted it FAI-complete.

Comment author: Wei_Dai 22 June 2010 10:56:53PM 1 point [-]

Can you please elaborate? I looked up "FAI-complete", and found this but I still don't get your point.

Comment author: Vladimir_Nesov 22 June 2010 11:13:15PM *  1 point [-]

See the DT list. (Copy of the post here.) FAI-complete problem = solving it means that FAI gets solved as well.