NancyLebovitz comments on A Rational Education - Less Wrong

12 Post author: wedrifid 23 June 2010 05:48AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (149)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 25 June 2010 12:31:39PM 0 points [-]

If men work very hard to keep women out of male roles (which seems to be the case), and women don't work especially hard to keep men out of female roles (which also seems to be the case), what do you think is going on?

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 25 June 2010 08:12:59PM 0 points [-]

A hypothesis: Men are more aggressive than women, and more apt to defend territory. This doesn't prove anything about which territory is more valuable.

Comment author: MichaelBishop 25 June 2010 09:33:08PM *  0 points [-]

For many people, their gender is an incredibly important aspect of their identity. One can think of a given subculture as having an ideal performance of masculinity. Men and women both respect that ideal. Certain occupations have been traditionally seen as very good ways of achieving that ideal. If women enter into such an occupation, the occupation is no longer seen as validating mens' manly virtues.

I oppose sex-discrimination in hiring, but there is no denying that this is a very serious loss for some men. Eventually, norms and ideals evolve in a way which allows men to continue to have their masculinity validated, and/or de-emphasizes gender as a component of one's identity, but this is a slow process. Moreover, with any change in values, there will always be winners and losers.

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 25 June 2010 09:51:15PM 0 points [-]

I think that's part of what's going on, but (if it matters), do you think people just happen to have gender performance as a major part of their identity, or are they trained into it?

Comment author: HughRistik 25 June 2010 10:24:47PM 3 points [-]

Both, I'd guess. While there is a lot of socialization around gender performance, there also seem to be biological factors the predispose people towards gender performance. To the extent that biological factors influence gender expression, I'm not even sure it is correct to say that gender is "socially constructed," at least not entirely.

For one example, look at the experience of some trans people as experiencing a strong gender identity as long as they remember (just one at odds with their socially assigned gender). I doubt that all of those feelings can be explained by social factors.

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 25 June 2010 10:35:36PM 1 point [-]

It seems to be common for boys to feel that they have to earn the right to consider themselves men, but I don't know how universal it is.

Comment author: wedrifid 26 June 2010 07:03:22AM *  1 point [-]

On a related note some psychological theorists suggest that not having a ritual process (with a significant element of 'trial by ordeal') to mark the transition from boyhood to manhood fundamentally impairs the psychological maturity of many males in western civilisation. Such ceremonies are nearly ubiquitous across tribal cultures.

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 26 June 2010 12:20:43PM 0 points [-]

I've heard it. However, how common are such ceremonies in non-tribal cultures?

Alternate hypothesis: having responsibility delayed for years beyond what's normal causes lack of psychological maturity. Or, maybe there isn't less maturity, maybe there's just more complaining about the lack of it.

Also, I was hoping to hear from from some of the men here about whether they personally feel this need to be definitively accepted as men.

Comment author: MichaelBishop 26 June 2010 09:59:09PM 0 points [-]

I don't think we should push too hard on the dichotomy of boy vs. man. I would emphasize that there is individual variation in how well men they can perform/achieve masculinity in their sub-culture. Women face the issue as well.

Comment author: wedrifid 25 June 2010 01:09:04PM -1 points [-]

Your observations about reality differ to mine. In fact, in some cases the reverse seems to be the case.

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 25 June 2010 01:33:30PM 1 point [-]

I was thinking specifically about the efforts to keep women out of the military, and complaints from women that other women give too much credit to men for doing child care.

What have you got in mind?

Comment author: wedrifid 25 June 2010 01:43:40PM *  2 points [-]

I was thinking specifically about the efforts to keep women out of the military

That one I can see. Bizarre too... as far as I can see every woman who is out getting shot puts me one dead body further away from being conscripted. (Mind you I feel instinctively uncomfortable writing that statement. In many circumstances I would censor myself because I estimate it would lower my sexual attractiveness in the eyes of females.)

nd complaints from women that other women give too much credit to men for doing child care.

Really? There are men that get too much credit for doing child care? What I would expect is women getting criticism from other women for being with a man who is low status (perhaps not in so many words). It is the kind of role that men are encouraged to take on but in most cases penalised socially for submitting to that pressure.

What have you got in mind?

My own occupation/training (IT).

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 25 June 2010 02:03:43PM 1 point [-]

Really? There are men that get too much credit for doing child care? What I would expect is women getting criticism from other women for being with a man who is low status (perhaps not in so many words). It is the kind of role that men are encouraged to take on but in most cases penalised socially for submitting to that pressure.

I've seen the complaints.

Men also lose status for being stay-at-home dads, so it's complicated.