Alicorn comments on Unknown knowns: Why did you choose to be monogamous? - Less Wrong

48 Post author: WrongBot 26 June 2010 02:50AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (651)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: wedrifid 26 June 2010 06:39:46AM *  5 points [-]

Why did you choose to be monogamous?

Some of my relationships are monogamous. The main advantage to them is that they take less time and effort. They can also reduce drama

Unfortunately monogamy involves creating an artificial monopoly on physical and emotional intimacy. The problems with monopolies that you learn in economics class apply to relationships too and constitute or cause a lot of the 'drama' of relationships. The Nash equilibrium in games modelling monopolies are very different from those without a monopoly and human instincts often reflect that difference depending on context.

Since that fateful day, I've been involved in both polyamorous and monogamous relationships, and I've become quite confident that I am happier, more fulfilled, and a better romantic partner when I am polyamorous. This holds even when I'm dating only one person; polyamorous relationships have a kind of freedom to them that is impossible to obtain any other way, as well as a set of similarly unique responsibilities.

This is counter-intuitive but I find it reasonably accurate. On a related note studies show that women orgasm more often and more powerfully when their partner has been with an other woman even if they are not consciously aware of this fact.

Comment author: Alicorn 26 June 2010 06:47:51AM 16 points [-]

studies show that women orgasm more often and more powerfully when their partner has been with an other woman even if they are not consciously aware of this fact.

How in the world do you ethically perform a study that shows this?

Comment author: wedrifid 26 June 2010 06:55:37AM *  14 points [-]

Err... Oops. I just went to google to try to find the relevant references. Let's just say that anything you can find on that topic on google would constitute "generalising from fictional evidence".

Comment author: Blueberry 26 June 2010 07:11:26AM *  7 points [-]

Take a group of women who are not in monogamous relationships and who are having sex with men who have other partners. Randomly assign half to group A and half to group B. Take one partner for each woman. Instruct the partners of the women in group A to not have sex with any other women for two weeks, and instruct the partners of the women in group B to have sex with their other partners frequently for two weeks. Ask the women to self-report how pleasurable they find the sex, and how often and powerfully they orgasm. Tell everyone participating in the study about this procedure, and get their consent to it.

Comment author: NihilCredo 27 June 2010 04:47:36PM 1 point [-]

It seems like finding a statistically useful number of such scientifically-inclined, polyamorous couples would be quite a challenge.

Comment author: Blueberry 27 June 2010 08:18:17PM 1 point [-]

To be clear, they don't have to be polyamorous couples: just using women who have a friend with benefits would work.

Comment author: wedrifid 26 June 2010 06:53:20AM 6 points [-]

Don't know, but the whole "double blind" part sounds kinda fun. :P