Vladimir_M comments on Unknown knowns: Why did you choose to be monogamous? - Less Wrong

48 Post author: WrongBot 26 June 2010 02:50AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (651)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Vladimir_M 27 June 2010 06:52:27PM 1 point [-]

NancyLebovitz:

However, there's got to be a complex interaction between status (some but not all of which is based on proving that you can afford to waste effort and resources) and accomplishment. I've brought up the subject a few times, but I don't seem to be able to get a grip on it, and no one else seems to have anything to say about it. Is it a non-problem, only interesting to me, or so hard that there's just nothing to say at this point?

It is a very difficult and complex question, which can't be discussed in its full generality in a single comment. It certainly involves numerous perplexing and counterintuitive phenomena where it's hard to even begin analyzing the situation coherently.

A couple of questions about status-- how do you keep from being blinded by other people's high status? How do you notice valuable people who aren't good at status?

Well, the only honest answers to both questions would be -- sometimes, possibly even often, I don't. But admitting that status is often a key force in shaping our beliefs that we nevertheless see as products of flawless logic and clear moral imperatives is a necessary condition to even begin disentangling our situation.

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 27 June 2010 10:44:35PM 0 points [-]

If you're willing to take a crack at the interactions between status and efficacy, I'm interested in seeing it.

Comment author: Vladimir_M 28 June 2010 12:43:56AM 2 points [-]

I don't know, it's a really complex question. If I ever form anything approaching a sketch of a complete theory, I'll probably post it. But certainly no simple proposition will do.