Alicorn comments on Unknown knowns: Why did you choose to be monogamous? - Less Wrong

48 Post author: WrongBot 26 June 2010 02:50AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (651)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: jsalvatier 28 June 2010 12:11:19AM 3 points [-]

I recall one of the Evolutionary Psychology books I read discussing this (I think it was The Moral Animal). It claimed that polygamy was relatively beneficial to high quality males and low quality females; high quality males would end up with more mates and low quality females would end up with a higher quality mate than they would otherwise. For the same reasons, monogamy was relatively beneficial to low quality men and high quality females; low quality men would have a higher chance of finding a mate at all and high quality females would end up with a higher quality mate.

Comment author: Alicorn 28 June 2010 12:15:16AM 7 points [-]

high quality females would end up with a higher quality mate.

Don't you mean that high quality females would wind up with the exclusive attention of a high quality mate? The quality itself probably doesn't change between scenarios.

Comment author: jsalvatier 28 June 2010 11:53:43PM 0 points [-]

I was thinking of "quality" as "overall attractiveness".

Comment author: Alicorn 29 June 2010 12:03:04AM 2 points [-]

I didn't suggest otherwise.