Violet comments on Unknown knowns: Why did you choose to be monogamous? - Less Wrong

48 Post author: WrongBot 26 June 2010 02:50AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (651)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Violet 28 June 2010 11:57:27PM 2 points [-]

5:3 would be far more enjoyable in my experience from polyamoric relationships.

Comment author: wedrifid 29 June 2010 03:36:02AM *  1 point [-]

Assuming from your name that you are female or gender atypical do you mean 5males:3females or the reverse? (I cannot tell whether you went with mine:opposite or male:female.)

Comment author: Violet 29 June 2010 08:16:35PM 2 points [-]

Don't really care for the genders of partners. So any gender mix really. Female + bisexual with mostly female partners at the moment.

Comment author: wedrifid 29 June 2010 08:20:38PM 0 points [-]

Lucky sod. :P

Comment author: Blueberry 29 June 2010 05:34:25AM 0 points [-]

From context, it looks like you were using the notation (# of partners that my partner has):(# partners that I have).