Strange7 comments on Unknown knowns: Why did you choose to be monogamous? - Less Wrong

48 Post author: WrongBot 26 June 2010 02:50AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (651)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Strange7 29 June 2010 07:04:12AM 2 points [-]

Oddly enough, the archetypal serpent was a well-developed concept before J. K. Rowling was born.

Both involve social incapacity, compensated for with cold analytics. Both are potential sources of powerful knowledge, complicated by disrespect for, or incomprehension of, traditional limits on the safe use of such knowledge. Both have an unnervingly primordial feel.

Comment author: Blueberry 29 June 2010 11:50:25PM 4 points [-]

Don't worry; I don't actually think Rowling made that up.

But I'm surprised by the "social incapacity" part: I would think of a serpent as sort of a sociopathic master manipulator.

Comment author: Strange7 18 April 2011 02:02:28PM 3 points [-]

Doesn't sociopathy qualify as a type of incapacity?

Comment author: Blueberry 25 March 2012 01:01:21AM 0 points [-]

An emotional one. Not necessarily a social one (though it can be).