Blueberry comments on Unknown knowns: Why did you choose to be monogamous? - Less Wrong

48 Post author: WrongBot 26 June 2010 02:50AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (651)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Blueberry 30 June 2010 12:11:34AM 0 points [-]

promiscuous sex outside the context of any relationship has little to do with relationship styles at all.

I'm not sure that's fair. Couldn't you say that having multiple friends with benefits is a type of " relationship style," in a sense?

monogamous norms are weakening, and these examples are the result of particular groups not having any strong relationship norms at all; various kinds of polyamory and swinging offer social norms that can be as strong as monogamous ones

Again, "take some time between serious relationships to have multiple casual partners" can be a relationship norm, one that appears very common.

Comment author: WrongBot 30 June 2010 02:32:53AM 1 point [-]

I would calling being friends with benefits a relationship; I was thinking more of relatively-anonymous one night stands.

Likewise, casual partners are still partners; I also think that having multiple casual partners is frowned upon much more than you indicate.