CronoDAS comments on So You Think You're a Bayesian? The Natural Mode of Probabilistic Reasoning - Less Wrong

48 Post author: Matt_Simpson 14 July 2010 04:51PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (79)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Tyrrell_McAllister 14 July 2010 06:10:37PM 2 points [-]

It's Bayes' theorem, not Baye's theorem :).

Comment author: CronoDAS 15 July 2010 12:06:59AM *  3 points [-]

No, it's Bayes's theorem.

Or at least it should be; I'm reasonably confident that you only use s' for plural possessives; singular nouns that end in s have a possessive form ending in s's.

Comment author: Tyrrell_McAllister 15 July 2010 12:20:33AM 2 points [-]

Personally, I always write "Bayes's". But since I was citing Wikipedia, I didn't want to muddy waters further by not using their convention.

Comment author: JoshuaZ 15 July 2010 12:40:26AM 1 point [-]

I've had this claim go both ways. I had at least one history teacher in highschool who strongly argued for this rule applying only to plural possessives. As with many rules, consistency matters more than anything else. I think that only applying it to plurals makes more sense (in that the distinction there actually helps you keep track of the number of the word) but it seems that nowadays it is more common for people to use s' construction for any word ending in s.