Aurini comments on So You Think You're a Bayesian? The Natural Mode of Probabilistic Reasoning - Less Wrong

48 Post author: Matt_Simpson 14 July 2010 04:51PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (79)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Divide 16 July 2010 01:50:11AM 7 points [-]

For example, 341, 0011001100110001, and XXXI all represent the same number using different systems of representation.

Okay, this is silly, but I can't for the life of me figure out what that number and those systems of representation are.

Comment author: Aurini 16 July 2010 05:13:14AM *  0 points [-]

Three possibilities:

  1. You're too dumb to notice the obvious,
  2. I don't get jokes, or:
  3. I'm too dumb to even notice the puzzle.

I feel a recursive loop coming on... YEEEAAAAARGH!