Kingreaper comments on Open Thread: July 2010 - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (653)
A small koan on utility functions that "refer to the real world".
Question to Clippy: would you agree to move into a simulation where you'd have all the paperclips you want?
Question to humans: would you agree to all of humankind moving into a simulation where we would fulfill our CEV (at least, all terms of it that don't mention "not living in a simulation")?
In both cases assume you have mathematical proof that the simulation is indestructible and perfectly tamper-resistant.
Would the simulation allow us to exit, in order to perform further research on the nature of the external world?
If so, I would enter it. If not? Probably not. I do not want to live in a world where there are ultimate answers and you can go no further.
The fact that I may already live in one is just bloody irritating :p
Good point. You have just changed my answer from yes to no.