ata comments on A Taxonomy of Bias: The Cognitive Miser - Less Wrong

52 Post author: Kaj_Sotala 02 July 2010 06:38PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (36)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: [deleted] 04 July 2010 12:12:13AM 5 points [-]

Talk to the statisticians. They've been using "Type I error" and "Type II error" instead of "false positive" and "false negative" for ages.

In this case, though, I had much less trouble than with the statistical errors. Possibly because those are essentially the same thing, differentiated only by which hypothesis is "null". Here, though, a Type 1 system and a Type 2 system are actually very different things. Plus as others have mentioned the ordering on the systems does make sense.

Comment author: ata 04 July 2010 12:43:12AM 7 points [-]

Talk to the statisticians. They've been using "Type I error" and "Type II error" instead of "false positive" and "false negative" for ages.

They're still bad names. It's like making new word processor documents and leaving them titled "Untitled 1" and "Untitled 2" instead of something descriptive.