RobinZ comments on Cryonics Wants To Be Big - Less Wrong

28 Post author: lsparrish 05 July 2010 07:50AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (160)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: lsparrish 05 July 2010 05:28:01PM 13 points [-]

Early adopters are (relatively) crazy and have to put up with ridicule from their friends because it's not cool yet. That's just how it goes. The trouble is that cryonics has stayed in the early adopter phase for 40 years.

Suddenly I have the mental image of a t-shirt reading "I was into cryonics before it was cool."

Comment author: advancedatheist 05 July 2010 06:12:30PM 4 points [-]

With a few exceptions, why does cryonics continue to repel female early adopters? I draw the contrast with Mormonism, which drew a lot of female early adopters despite sanctions against their participation in it. One, they had to defy taboos about getting involved in weird, heretical new religions; and two, they especially had to defy taboos against polygyny and adultery. Yet their participation turned Mormonism into a demographically successful church. If Mormonism had attracted mostly men, its demographic breakthrough wouldn't have happened.

Comment author: RobinZ 06 July 2010 01:50:44AM 3 points [-]

With a few exceptions, why does cryonics continue to repel female early adopters?

A few exceptions? I don't get the impression that the statistics are that severely skewed.

Comment author: arundelo 08 July 2010 02:49:41PM *  3 points [-]

According to Kerry Howley's NYT article just linked by ciphergoth:

The ratio of men to women among living [cryonicists] is roughly three to one.

(Problematic, but not quite "few exceptions" territory.)