Unknowns comments on Open Thread: July 2010, Part 2 - Less Wrong

6 Post author: Alicorn 09 July 2010 06:54AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (770)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Unknowns 26 July 2010 10:40:51AM 3 points [-]

A second post has been banned. Strange: it was on a totally different topic from Roko's.

Comment author: cousin_it 26 July 2010 11:25:11AM *  3 points [-]

(comment edited)

I wonder why PlaidX's post isn't getting deleted - the discussion there is way closer to the forbidden topic.

Comment author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 26 July 2010 12:02:50PM 2 points [-]

Still the sort of thing that will send people close to the OCD side of the personality spectrum into a spiral of nightmares, which, please note, has apparently already happened in at least two cases. I'm surprised by this, but accept reality. It's possible we may have more than the usual number of OCD-side-of-the-spectrum people among us.

Comment author: xamdam 26 July 2010 01:55:27PM 3 points [-]

Was the discussion in question epistemologicaly interesting (vs. intellectual masturbation)? If so, how many OCD personalities joining the site would call for closing the thread? I am curious about decision criteria. Thanks.

As an aside, I've had some SL-related psychological effects, particularly related to material notion of self: a bit of trouble going to sleep, realizing that logically there is little distinction from death-state. This lasted a short while, but then you just learn to "stop worrying and love the bomb". Besides "time heals all wounds" certain ideas helped, too. (I actually think this is an important SL, though it does not sit well within the SciFi hierarchy).

This worked for me, but I am generally very low on the OCD scale, and I am still mentally not quite ready for some of the discussions going on here.

Comment author: Apprentice 26 July 2010 02:35:32PM 4 points [-]

If so, how many OCD personalities joining the site would call for closing the thread? I am curious about decision criteria. Thanks.

It is impossible to have rules without Mr. Potter exploiting them.

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 26 July 2010 12:38:37PM 1 point [-]

Is it OCD or depression? Depression can include (is defined by?) obsessively thinking about things that make one feel worse.

Comment author: JoshuaZ 26 July 2010 01:13:14PM 1 point [-]

Depressive thinking generally focuses on short term issues or general failure. I'm not sure this reflects that. Frankly, it seems to come across superficially at least more like paranoia, especially of the form that one historically saw (and still sees) in some Christians worrying about hell and whether or not they are saved. The reaction to these threads is making me substantially update my estimates both for LW as a rational community and for our ability to discuss issues in a productive fashion.

Comment author: jimrandomh 26 July 2010 12:27:29PM 1 point [-]

Yep. But not unexpectedly this time; homung posted in the open thread that he was looking for 20 karma so he could post on the subject, and I sent him a private message saying he shouldn't, which he either didn't see or ignored.

Comment author: wedrifid 31 July 2010 04:16:24AM 0 points [-]

What was the second topic? I am most interested in knowing just what things are forbidden.

Comment author: Unknowns 31 July 2010 05:22:49AM 2 points [-]

It was about the possibility of torturing someone by creating copies of the person and torturing them.

Comment author: ata 31 July 2010 04:52:27AM *  0 points [-]

If I'm thinking of the right post, it's another one that involved AI and torture, though from a very different angle than Roko's post. It was a dialogue between a human and a uFAI; I don't quite remember what points it was trying to make, but if we're talking about what could affect people with OCD/anxiety conditions, then it's probably just the "uFAI talking about torturing people" aspect that was deemed problematic anyway.

Comment author: wedrifid 31 July 2010 05:12:56AM 0 points [-]

but if we're talking about what could affect people with OCD/anxiety conditions, then it's probably just the "uFAI talking about torturing people" aspect that was deemed problematic anyway.

Ahh, I remember the one. It was titled "What do you choose? 3^^^3 people being tortured for 50 years or some E. coli in the eye?" uFAIs in counterfactuals do evil things in contrived scenarios. It's what they do.

Comment author: ata 31 July 2010 05:15:58AM *  0 points [-]

Oh, wow, I don't think I saw that one. I guess that makes three banned AI-torture posts, then?

Edit: The one I was thinking of was "Acausal torture? But a scratch, in the multiverse. (A dialogue for human and UFAI)".