Sniffnoy comments on What Intelligence Tests Miss: The psychology of rational thought - Less Wrong

35 Post author: Kaj_Sotala 11 July 2010 11:01PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (53)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Sniffnoy 12 July 2010 11:57:07AM 1 point [-]

He also argues that it would be perfectly possible though expensive to prevent general rationality tests that would be akin to intelligence tests, and that also using RQ proxies for things such as college admission would have great social benefits.

Is there a typo here? The two clauses don't seem to quite go together.

Comment author: Emile 12 July 2010 02:38:14PM 1 point [-]

I didn't understand that either, maybe "prevent" should be "present"?

Comment author: Fleisch 12 July 2010 07:58:49PM 2 points [-]

I think he meant to write "invent".

Comment author: Kaj_Sotala 12 July 2010 09:14:59PM *  0 points [-]

Changed it to "develop". (I think "invent" was what I originally meant, but "develop" makes more sense.)