MichaelBishop comments on What Intelligence Tests Miss: The psychology of rational thought - Less Wrong

35 Post author: Kaj_Sotala 11 July 2010 11:01PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (53)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: MichaelBishop 13 July 2010 04:33:18PM 1 point [-]

I take it Stanovich is doing a lot of experiments where he controls for IQ, or compares performance within and across IQ groups. Here is my concern... there is always measurement error, and the more error in his measure of IQ, the more it will appear he's measuring something distinct from IQ which he terms "rationality."

That said, I also agree that IQ, and G, are often reified. The point is, I'm not sure Stanovich has succeeded in carving cognition skills at their joints, but I don't have anything better to offer.