Peter_de_Blanc comments on Some Thoughts Are Too Dangerous For Brains to Think - Less Wrong

15 Post author: WrongBot 13 July 2010 04:44AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (311)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Peter_de_Blanc 13 July 2010 05:02:34AM 5 points [-]

There has not yet been a truly benevolent dictator and it would be delusional at best to believe that you will be the first.

This is true approximately to the extent that there has never been a truly benevolent person. Power anti-corrupts.

Comment author: gwern 13 July 2010 06:27:00AM 7 points [-]

I don't understand your second sentence.

Comment author: EStokes 13 July 2010 06:54:06PM *  11 points [-]

I believe that what he's saying is that with power, people show their true colors. Consciously or not, nice people may have been nice because it benefitted them to. The fact that there were too many penalties for not being nice when they didn't have as much power was a "corruption" of their behavior, in a sense. With the power they gained, the penalties didn't matter enough compared to the benefits.

Comment author: Blueberry 13 July 2010 08:27:43PM 0 points [-]

Wow, you're really good at interpreting cryptic sentences!

Comment author: xamdam 13 July 2010 11:24:27PM 0 points [-]

I think "Elementary, dear Watson" was in order ;)

Comment author: Douglas_Knight 14 July 2010 07:31:48AM 3 points [-]

In favor of the "power just allows corrupt behavior" theory, Bueno de Mesquita offers two very nice examples of people who ruled two different states. One is Leopold of Belgium, who simultaneously ruled Belgium and the Congo. The other is Chiang Kai-shek, who sequentially ruled China and Taiwan, allegedly rather differently. (I heard him speak about these examples in this podcast. BdM, Morrow, Silverson, and Smith wrote about Leopold here, gated)